99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

An Old Fashion Dog Fight in the Big Apple

An Old Fashion Dog Fight in the Big Apple:

The 1998 U.S. Senate race in New York is one of the most heated and competitive political battles in the country. New York has traditionally been a place where only the strong willed, and tough at heart could compete; a place where crafty tactics, extensive connections, and stocks of cash are essential aspects of political competition. This year's combat field of a campaign has been no exception. The two primary candidates, 60 year old, incumbent, republican, Alfonse D'Amato, and 47 year old, democratic challenger, Charles E. Schumer, have been pitted against each other, head to head, for much of the campaign. Both candidates have strong backgrounds and powerful messages while also pursuing rather abrasive, aggressive, and, in some instances, vindictive strategies. Most current polls have the two contestants neck and neck, with Schumer gaining a slight advantage in recent days. The fact of the matter is that D'Amato is a strong politician that knows how to get things done; however, he also flaunts a capricious, and impulsive style. With Al D'Amato, "what you see is what you get, and what you get is often vital, sometimes us


Unfortunately, particular strategies and tactics pursued by the respective candidates during the election has clouded much of their positive attributes. Both candidates certainly contributed their fair share of negative 30 second Ad bits. D'Amato, however, is the king of the negative ad. His attack on Schumer, one of the hardest-working and most conscientious members of Congress, for missing votes is outrageous and grossly distorted. This is how D'Amato has always run his campaigns though, by knocking down the other guy; and, indeed, this is where the reality of modern American politics seems to be heading, for good or for worse. The record certainly shows that D'Amato is one of the most enthusiastic practitioners of this "black art" and that anyone running against him would have no choice but to attempt to "respond in kind or be buried in an avalanche of mud."20 So, indeed, Schumer has replied, airing his own attacks; questioning D'Amato's truthfulness and his ethics. Both candidates also have attempted to capitalize on each and everyone of their opponents misspoken words, gravely distorting the importance and the underlying reasons of the statements. It has simply become an absurd circus of "look what he said about this and about that." This negative sentiment was not solely pursued through television ad's mind you, the two candidates would take every opportunity to bash their opponent: at press conferences, interviews, and the like. The unfortunate result, is that these candidates spent far more money attacking each other, than promoting there own positive images. This strategy has made the campaign one of the most expensive and distasteful campaigns in American history.

Yet another strategy implemented by both candidates, and by most candidates across the nation for that matter, is publicly getting support for their election from other prominent politicians. In the last weeks of the campaign, both Schumer and D'Amato have made a blitz of public appearances with variety of politicians. Schumer could have been seen with President Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Vice President Gore, Senator Moynehan, as well as an assortment of local political leaders. D'Amato got the support of Governor Pataki, Orthodox Jewish leaders, Mayor Giuliani, and a variety of local leaders. This particular strategy has, in the past, proven to be quite effective if the proper mix of supporters is chosen.

On another strategy front, D'Amato has consistently been able to win a large chunk of the Jewish vote in the past; and indeed this has been crucial to his victories. During this election cycle, he has focused a great deal of time and effort on maintaining this advantage. He even went as far as saying "he will beat Schumer in his own backyard."21 Possibly the strongest argument for D'Amato's candidacy however, is that in a Republican-controlled Senate he will be an inside force fighting for the interests of New York and the region. It is an argument that cannot be easily dismissed; and it's an argument D'Amato has been pounding home recently.

Though, after in depth analysis, it become clear that New York is likely in store for its first new Senator in D'Amato's spot in 18 years. D'Amato does have an impressive record of not only getting things done, but getting things done for New York. However, he does also have staunch conservative views on a variety of issues which seem to clearly place him out of synch with his constituents. Furthermore, his historic, instinctive, and improper out bursts have embarrassed New Yorkers enough. Chuck Schumer is the more youthful,

Some common words found in the essay are:
York City, Urban Affairs14, York Schumer, Charles Schumer, Schumer D'Amato, House Democrats', Al D'Amato, Apple D'Amato, Roman Catholic, Senate Unfortunately, york city, schumer d'amato, voter pop, charles schumer, gun control, indeed schumer, people york, d'amato consistently, impulsive style, differences unfortunately,
Approximate Word count = 2423
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on An Old Fashion Dog Fight in the Big Apple

Veganism1748 words

Look at even more essays on An Old Fashion Dog Fight in the Big Apple
More Politics Essays

Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers