Justification and Weaknesses of the Non-Interpretive
the Non-Interpretive Model By: Anonymous Brief: Justification and Weaknesses of the Non-Interpretive Model The question of Constitutional interpretation still has yet to be resolved. Should only the explicit commands of our nation's Founding Fathers be referenced in courts of law, or can it be justified that an outside body should extrapolate from the specific text of the Constitution to define and defend additional fundamental rights? Further, if this body, namely the Supreme Court, bases its decisions of constitutional relevance not wholly on exact interpretation, then regardless of reason, are they wholly illegitimate? The non-interpretive model allows the Court to interpret beyond the exact wording of the Constitution to define and protect the values of a society. The question of how the non-interpretative model can be justified must be answered. Despite
example of the manner by which the Supreme Court would act as the grounds for the non-interpretive model. It is said that this decision contemporary society are legitimate, history as well as the citizens of recognizes the superiority of the non-interpretive model. There are clause is no longer justified. Fair criminal and civil procedures must be generality of the Constitution to define and defend vested rights and flexibility. In this manner, a prima facie argument against the history has chosen the non-interpretative model without which many of allowed for many fundamental decisions that have served to protect
Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, Founding Fathers, Constitution Freedom, Hence Court, Hence Constitution, Court Justices, Constitution Court, Marbury Madison, Constitution Indeed, Non-Interpretive Model, non-interpretive model, supreme court, natural rights, human rights, interpretive model, non-interpretative model, constitution define, text constitution, rights citizens, founding fathers, constitution define defend, non-interpretive model court, non-interpretive model allowed, due process clause, issues human rights,
Approximate Word count = 4741
Approximate Pages = 19 (250 words per page double spaced)
|