Homosexual marriages
Homosexuals should be allowed to marry because the disallowance of it violates their constitutional rights. Marriage is an institution long recognized by our government under the right to pursue happiness, and denying that right to any couple, regardless of gender, is unconstitutional. This argument, though, is not disputed. In fact, none of the arguments raised in opposition to the allowance of homosexual marriages takes into account the constitutional rights afforded to all humans. The arguments are only in relation to the possible repercussions (real or imagined) of granting these rights. Our nation was built and has always been based on the fundamental principles of freedom expressed in the Declaration of Independence and through our Constitution. The opponents of homosexual marriage need to remember what freedom means to America, and understand the significance of setting a precedent that denies that freedom.The Supreme Court has long recognized that the institution of marriage is one of the rights guaranteed to all Americans by our Constitution. In the case of Loving vs. Virginia, the Supreme Court said, "The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal
The problem is not with single-sex parenting but with single parenting. An internet article, "Kids With Gay Parents", says that, "...various studies of families with same-sex and opposite sex parents...showed that genders of the parents are unimportant to the quality of child-rearing, but that family breakdowns are very harmful to children." Under these grounds, these studies could actually be used to support the homosexual position in that a committed homosexual relationship would be more stable for a child than an unstable heterosexual relationship. I have a hard copy of my works cited page and I don't feel like typing it in. If you really need, e-mail me and I'll send it to you. These reasons against gay marriage only deal with the consequences of what may happen if this is allowed. It is all speculation and has nothing to do with what is already a constitutional right. These same arguments were also offered thirty years ago towards interracial marriages. Journalist Deb Price offers this, "..all (arguments) seem to echo the debates heard in the late 1960's when the morality of racially mixed marriages was being debated. One only needs to change a few words in the present day arguments against gays and lesbian marriage in order to produce replicas of those earlier racist statements." Americans how can one not want to uphold these rights. Women are stronger for them, African-Americans are stronger for them, religions are stronger for them, parents a
Some common words found in the essay are:
Deb Price, Win Despite, Marriages Homosexuals, Gay Parents, Eric Black, Declaration Independence, Supreme Court, United America, Steve Chapman, Independence Constitution, homosexual marriages, supreme court, same-sex marriages, constitutional rights, constitutional rights afforded, single-sex parenting, gay parents, kids gay, marriages allowed, rights afforded, kids gay parents, homosexual marriages allowed, allowance homosexual,
Approximate Word count = 995
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
