US Immigration Should Not Be Curbed

The argument over whether or not immigration should be restricted, is fought out by Daniel James and Stephen Moore. James essentially believes that jobs are being taken away from American workers, immigrants are causing an increase of population (and subsequent pollution of the environment), and breaking up American culture. Moore, on the other hand, insists that immigrants are vital to the success of the country as a whole and without them, we would not be the country that we are. He believes that immigrants have created, not destroyed, jobs and have enhanced the economy and the culture. The arguments are presented well by both sides, however, Stephen Moore is the better voice for my opinion; Immigration to the United Stated should not be restricted.

James fears that current laws on immigration will eventually lead to unprecedented numbers and unforeseen problems. He sights several problems, one of which is overcrowding. Projections indicate that between 45 and 54 million people will enter the U.S. in a little over a generation and this number would increase if Communism falls in Cuba. This overcrowding, he feels, would lead to another problem: pollution. In California, for examp

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Daniel James, Donald Huddle, United Stated, Washington DC, Moore James, Mexico America, Lady Liberty, Home Free, Diego Orange, Korea Europe, stephen moore, daniel james, jobs american, jobs americans, los angeles,
Approximate Word count = 1207
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)