Galileo, Science and the Church, by Jerome J. Langford, are about the trials and tribulations of Galileo with the Roman Catholic Church in the 1600's. The church did not agree with Galileo's ideas; mainly theories associated with Copernican astronomy. The primary intention of Langford is to bring the truth of Galileo's trials to his readers, and to show that ultimately Galileo was correct in his theories and was not trying to go against the churches' belief. Galileo was merely trying to seek truth in science, and wanted to be known as a historical scientific figure. Therefore, Galileo was unjustly accused, ridiculed, and convicted of heresy.
In Galileo's defense of heresy, Langford writes, " This was an unfortunate decision on several accounts. First the Copernican opini
The church disagreed with Galileo's thoughts. They actually went as far as telling Galileo that he was to stop preaching his ideas as long as he was involved with the church. Langford writes, "Yet, recalling the tone of the prohibition, Urban conceded that so long as Galileo treated the Copernican theory as a hypothesis, he could write all he wanted on the subject." (114) If he would leave the church, he would be able to voice his opinions and ideas freely.
on was treated as heretical when, in reality, it was not." (155) Langford goes on to explain that the theological Consultors in 1616 recognized the earth's mobility as "formally heretical", but this did not make the immobility of the earth a matter of faith. Catholic philosophers and theologians also agree that the decree of the Holy Office did
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$