2.degradation of the parent and family life

3.objectitivation of children and social harm.

The possibilities of the embryo being harm are extremely high. For example, before scientists actually achieve the species Dolly it took a recorded 277 experimental tries. In case of humans, being a more complicated mammal, it would undoubtedly prove more in deaths and lethal birth defects. Suggestions to improve these complications are to use a large controlled pool of mammals so one can reduce the margin of error until it equals the normal risks of miscarriages and infant deat

Lastly, the possibility of social harm would be the final deteoriation of the clone's well being. An encouragement for a form of eugenics in which society decides which traits are desirable.

In addition to, The objectification of the children could arise as a result of an "unhomely" environment. Clones might be used to donate organs or replace a lost loved one. Such acts promote psychological damage that lasts a lifetime with the child feeling a lack of individuality and constrained by the history of their gene donor.

In addition to, researches have these semi- organic "blank cells" for creating clones. These cells are not really real but act as organic cells to produce antibiotics and other secretions. If then clones are not actually completely human, do they have equal constitional rights? Dred Scott in 1857 was ruled 3/5th of a human, thus property and not a citizen. Will clones fall into this field of shame? In reverse, let say the "other you" proves to be a more efficient employee, family member and citizen than you.

" The ability for humans to create humans without the normal process of fertilization and to create copie

Some common words found in the essay are:
, Hastings Center, Dred Scott, Dr Seed, Richard Seed, human cloning, family life, film gattaca, social harm,
Approximate Word count = 769
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)