To support my thesis is Brutus is deciding if he should join the conspiracy against

Julius Caesar or not to join the conspiracy, this can be proved because Brutus says,

I know no reason to spurn him, But

for the general. He would be crowned.

How that might change his nature, there's the question.

Here Brutus is saying that he says no personal reason to kill him, but if Julius is crowned king, he would probably become a tyrant. In this passage, Brutus is making a decision based merely on an assumption. Another event within my passage to support my thesis is when Brutus says", By which he did ascend. So Caesar may; then lest he may, prevent".(II, iii, 27-28) Here I

In the passage the conspirators have decided that the best way to kill Caesar is by cutting off his head. They also say that they will be sacrificers not butchers. To me, when the conspirators say," lets be sacrificers , but not butchers".( II, i,166) , that's just a cop out

abuse. If these motives weak, break

past( in Brutus' eyes) has been blameless and whose

think Brutus is trying to say that Caesar will become power crazy and forget where he came from. In this part of Brutus' soliloquy, Brutus seems as though he probably will join the conspiracy at this point.

nature of a man long accustomed to great power, whose

Some common words found in the essay are:
Julius Caesar, Robert Ornstein, Virgil Whitaker, Cassius Brutus, Act IIscene, Caius II, Ceasar Shakespeare's, Caesar Brutus, Brutus Lucius, Virgil Whitaker's, join conspiracy, kill caesar, deciding join conspiracy, thesis brutus, passage brutus, brutus deciding, sacrificers butchers, brutus deciding join, deciding join, support thesis brutus, support thesis, soliloquy occurs, suggests inner conflict, caesar power, thesis brutus deciding,
Approximate Word count = 1184
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)