King Lear misc
In William Shakespeare's King Lear, the similar events that Lear and Gloucester experience result in a parallel plot sequence for the story. Lear and Gloucester are similar characters because they are experiencing similar problems while playing the role of a father. Their children also have a similar eagerness for power, a problem that both Lear and Gloucester should not have to deal with while addressing serious mental and physical dilemmas. And although the two characters are very similar, the story of King Lear is tragic, and Gloucester's is not. Lear's tragedy is a result of bringing fate upon himself, which in turn stripes Lear of everything, and only in his final moments does Lear resolve some of his problems with a catharsis. To ensure that Lear's story is indeed tragic while Gloucester's is not, an examination of tragedy is necessary. Also, the overall situation and well being of the two characters is helpful in deciding who brings upon their own problems, and who becomes a victim throughout the play. Decisions made by Lear are also determining factors of tragedy, even from the very beginning of the play. The events that Lear and Gloucester experience are similar, but their positions i
The children of Lear and Gloucester follow similar story lines, as greed becomes the character flaw among many of the players. The action taken by Lear leaves a tempting opportunity for Reagan and Goneril when Lear decides to divide his kingdom. Lear enters the room and says: "Meantime we shall express our darker purpose...To take all cares and business from our age, Conferring them on younger strengths, while we unburthen'd crawl toward death." (p. 2) At this point both Reagan and Goneril give exaggerated accounts for their love to Lear in order to get the part of the kingdom they desire. Reagan gives an extravagant speech: "I find she names my very deed of love; only she comes too short: that I profess...I am alone felicitate in your dear highness' love." (p. 3) Reagan and Goneril are a dynamic duo through the course of the play; they become more corrupt and greedy toward the completion of the play. The characteristics of Edmund are fundamentally evil. He is a static character, always associated with evil people and taking cruel actions. When trying to start a violent conflict with Edgar, Edmund says: "Some blood drawn on me would beget opinion." (p. 32) Edmund takes similar courses of deception later in the play, but he does not become as tragic of a character. The character King Lear fit Aristotle's definition of tragedy. He was a lofty character that brought about his own misfortune, and in the end of the play exper
Some common words found in the essay are:
Edgar Edmund, Gloucester Aristotle, Lear Gloucester, King Lear, Reagan Goneril, Gloucester's Lear's, Goneril Lear, Edmund Gloucester, Decisions Lear, lear gloucester, king lear, lear kingdom, reagan goneril, events lear, fit aristotle's definition, tragic figure, lineage throne, tragic gloucester's, aristotle's definition, story tragedy, events lear gloucester, lear gloucester experience,
Approximate Word count = 970
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
