For years, part of the American public, and humans in general, have been fascinated

with the possibility of creating human life by other than natural means. There are many who

strongly disagree with the idea of human cloning. It certainly wasn't surprising when they

were able to clone a sheep and will not be the least surprised if someday scientist's

will be able to clone a human being. Should cloning for human benefits or even human

cloning itself be allowed in society today? That is a question we must ask ourselves?

On one side of the issue are those who believe that human cloning should be permitted.

One thing that shows this, is what human cloning research may bring. Those who opposed

to a ban believe that human cloning research could bring substantial benefits, including the

development of new treatments for cystic fibrosis, other diseases and the ability to create

animal with normal compatible organs for transplant. (1."Should Congress Prohibit All

Human Cloning Experimentation",Pg 34). From my opinion, I bel

be allowed. One thing that strongly disagrees is what possible consequence can be

creation is not simply a matter of scientific inquiry. It is a matter of morality and

Secondly, human cloning is not at all "natural" meaning that a child born of cloning is not

Some common words found in the essay are:
Cloning AllowedPg1, Cloning ExperimentationsPg, Cloning ExperimentationPg, Furthermore Clinton, Permitted American, Cloning BeAllowedPg, Human Cloning, Allowed Pg1, Experimentation Pg, Experimentation's Pg, human cloning, congress prohibit, congress prohibit human, prohibit human, believe human cloning, believe human, cloning research, cloning allowed, child born, human cloning research, human life, human cloning allowed, prohibit human cloning, believe cloning, born cloning,
Approximate Word count = 2213
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)