death penalty
You have heard from the affirmative side and you may disagree or agree with some of their points, but the reality is that their plan will not and cannot succeed in today’s society. True, on paper the plan looks very good, but it will not work. Today’s present system, with the death penalty is much better off then without it. The negative side, which my partner and I represent, feels that the death penalty should not be abolished and that today’s system, which allows states to choose if they want to impose the death penalty, should continue to be used. It is true that innocent people have been executed, but that number is miniscule compared to the amount of “true” criminals that are rightfully executed. There is 28-step procedure necessary before any person can be given a death sentence. By having the process consist of numerous steps and involving many different people, human error is greatly reduced. The death penalty is not racially or gender bias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. The fact is that men commit more crimes, so they will be convicted at a greater rate then women. The ratio of men to women on death row and executed is 68:1 or 3400:50 (NAACP Spring 1996). Fr
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
NAACP Summer, , NAACP Spring, death penalty, penalty cruel unusual, system death penalty, death penalty cruel, affirmative teams plan, Bibliography None, death row, person chance, life parole, 701 murders, todays system, chance kill, penalty cruel, cruel unusual, system death,
Approximate Word count = 1131
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
