Double Standard of Masculinity in Gender Role Socialization

Masculinity is a topic that has been debated in our society extensively, through research as well as in informal settings. Many wonder what it means to be masculine, and if we can really assign a definition to such a subjective term. After all, shouldn't one's own perception be the determinant of what constitutes masculinity? This self-construction would be the ideal in our society, but unfortunately, it represents a false belief. Masculinity has certain characteristics assigned to it by our culture. In this paper I will explore the many facets of masculinity and demonstrate how certain beliefs pertaining to it are perpetuated in our society. I will also uncover many of the contradictions between society's assigned definition of masculinity and the expectation that males will somehow learn how to act contrary to that assigned and learned meaning.

Men are primarily and secondarily socialized into believing certain characteristics are definitive in determining their manliness and masculinity. These characteristics range from not crying when they get hurt to being and playing violently. The socialization of masculinity in our society begins

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Lee Bowker, Definition Masculinity, Pollack Harvard, Sambia Guinea, Health Invariably, Dale Petersen, Socialization Masculinity, Evolution Desire, Witt Susan, David Buss, york ny, physical prowess, double standard, socially defined, aggressive behavior, health fitness, definition masculinity, oaks ca sage, et al, little boys, athletic prowess, ca sage publications, double standard masculinity, thousand oaks ca,
Approximate Word count = 2427
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)