The Analysis of a Paternalistic Government

A Report on Our Right to Drugs by Thomas Szasz

You might be tempted to label Thomas Szasz, author of Our Right to Drugs, The Case for a Free Market, a counter-culture hippie. However, this analysis couldn't be further from the truth. Szasz, a Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at the State University of New York Health Science Center in Syracuse, is a major supporter of civil liberties. He sees the so-called "War on Drugs" as one of the worst atrocities that the American Government has perpetrated on its people. Szasz contends that the prohibition of certain drugs, including common prescription drugs, is nothing more than the government telling the people that "father knows best". It is this paternalistic attitude that Szasz finds so oppressive.

Mr. Szasz makes three key arguments throughout his book. First, the "War on Drugs" is a failure and can never succeed. It should be stopped immediately. Second, drug legalization is not a viable answer. It would only turn into another attempt by the government to control drugs and would not be any more of a free market than the current system of drug prohibition. Third, he propose

Szasz has really done something amazing with this book. Being a child of the 1980s, I have had anti-drug propaganda shoved down my throat at every corner. Whether it was "just say no" or images of how "stupid" marijuana made you, it was a staple of a young boy's life. It even got to me. The government convinced me that drugs were evil, something that only hardened criminals did. Even worse, drugs could transform a little boy into a hardened criminal. What Szasz has been able to do with his arguments, however, is open my eyes to the other side of the debate. Now, given the knowledge his book has given me, I am able to make more informed decisions when it comes to the laws of our country. I only hope that one day I am in a position to educate more people of the atrocities our government is guilty of.

s a solution. The solution is to end all drug regulation by the government; in effect, creating a free market for drugs. He doesn't stop at illicit drugs, however. He also includes prescription drugs in this solution as well. He sees the government's drug control policy as an attempt by the government to control its population, much like a parent controls his/her children.

In comparison, Szasz analyzes how legalizing drugs would be much like the system of prescription medication. The comparison between the prescription drug to the illicit drug is one of Szasz's most compelling arguments. According to Szasz, we will never be able to "control" all the substances out there. Szasz outlines how this mentality is much like an overprotective parent. The government doesn't trust its own people with their own bodies and the decisions that affect their bodies. Szasz states, in no uncertain terms, that people should be able to do whatever they want to their own bodies.

As we delve into Mr. Szasz's first argument, we begin to see major problems with the government'

Some common words found in the essay are:
According Szasz, War Drugs, Princeton University, Constitution American, American Government, free market, Thomas Szasz, Free Market, Center Syracuse, Ethan Nadelmann, szasz page, market drugs, , free market drugs, according szasz, war drugs, prohibition drugs, drug legalization, szasz contends, criminal element, drugs free, drugs free market, free market szasz, limiting free market, criminal element szasz,
Approximate Word count = 1272
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)