Right To Live

mentally competent, but deemed terminally ill, be allowed to engagein physician-assisted suicide? According to the

First Amendment of The Constitution of The United States, “one hasthe freedom to petition the government for a

redress of grievances.“ The Fourteenth Amendment states, “The Statecannot deprive any person of life, liberty or

property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within itsjurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.“ The

group believes that a terminally ill patient has the Constitutionalright to decide whether or not to end his or her life with

the help of a licensed medical doctor. There have been many cases overthe years where a terminally ill patient who is

mentally competent has made the choice to either partake in physician-assistedsuicide or euthanasia.

“Physician-assisted suicide occurs when the physician provides thepatient with the means

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Amendment Statecannot, Charles Hall, Fourteenth Amendment, UnitedStates America, Dignity Act, Supreme Court, Die Physician-assisted, Seminole County, Beth Cruzan, Missouri Court, terminally ill, charles hall, physician-assisted suicide, fourteenth amendment, own life, mentally competent, life liberty property, terminal illness, liberty property, property due, measure 16, liberty property due, nancy beth cruzan, terminally ill patient,
Approximate Word count = 686
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)