Animal Testing
Traditionally, animals have been used to ensure the safety of our consumer products and drugs. Yet around the world, scientists, regulators and animal protectionists work together to develop alternatives to their use. The use of animals in the life sciences dates back to ancient Greece and the earliest medical experiments. To learn about swallowing, physicians cut open into the throat of a living pig. To study the beating heart, they cut open into its chest. For centuries physicians and researchers used animals to enhance their knowledge about how the various organs and systems of the body functioned, as well as to hone their surgical skills. As long as animals have been used in experiments, people have expressed concerns about such research. Questions about the morality, necessity, and scientific validity of animal experiments have arisen since those ancient physicians first began to study bodily functions. Alternatives are methods, which refine existing tests by minimizing animal distress, reduce the number of animals necessary for an experiment or replace whole animal use with vitro or other tests. While vivisection has received more attention and funding, clinical and epidemiological (studying the natural course of disea
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, HPV Program, Stonybrook Actually, Volume Tests, Russell Burch, Toms Maine, Maine Co, Welfare Act, Jon Evans, Carries Reduction, animal tests, medical schools animals, animal experiments, baby rats, force fed, anti cavity, clinical epidemiological, animal experimentation, medical schools, animal welfare, lung cancer,
Approximate Word count = 970
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
