To begin, the power is a little different of the two cars. First of all they both have 13B rotary engines, but the FD has twin sequential turbochargers and the FC has a single turbo. The FD makes about 255 horsepower and 220 lb-ft of torque. The FC has 200 horsepower and 196 lb-ft of torque. The bottom end power is much better on the FD because it has the twin sequential turbochargers, which means it will be easier to drive around in traf

Finally, there are many things to consider when modifying these cars. There are many parts available for both models, so that isn't something to worry about. The 3rd generation will need a computer upgrade if you do more than two things to free up air flow (exhaust, down-pipe, mid-pipe, intake). If you don't upgrade the computer the engine will run dangerously lean and might blow up. On the FC the computer upgrade isn't as mandatory, but you will need to get a fuel cut defender, which is much cheaper than a computer upgrade.

Third, maintenance is always a big concern when it comes to RX-7s. The FD is much more complicated and not as reliable as the FC. This is mostly because of the very complex sequential turbo system, which has over 60 vacuum hoses that tend to break, or pop of causing the car not to work right. The FC is a little simpler since it only has one turbo and there

Some common words found in the essay are:
C5 FC, RX-7s FD, FD Getting, RX-7 Twin, 3rd generation, , 2nd generation, Mazda RX-7, FC3S FD, fc little, computer upgrade, twin sequential turbochargers, vacuum hoses, sequential turbochargers, fd twin, power little, lb-ft torque, twin sequential, fd twin sequential,
Approximate Word count = 600
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)