Is cloning necessary for advancements in improving the quality of life? People often question whether or not we as a scientific nation are trying to play the role of God. Many people say that we should not try to interfere with nature. That is fine if in everyday life we did not try to change our habitat every single second of every single day. More than likely at one point and time the land on which your house sits was covered by a pasture of woodlands. That is interference. If we try to clone organs for transplant patients that are in their final hour then we are actually improving their life. If improvement in the quality of life is playing God, then is that necessarily a bad thing?

Do we have the right to clone? We are all guaranteed rights by the fact that we are human beings. Those rights include the right to pursue areas of scientific study. Not many people vocalized his or her disapproval of space exploration. At the time that there was no talk of how morally wrong Neil Armstrong's walk on the moon was going to be. They could have argued the fact we are created on earth we must stay here and not interfere with things beyond our compreh

ension. If they did, and the program did not lift off, then we would not have some of the technologies that we have today. Cloning can only yield new technologies that will be beneficial to society.

Cloning will change the face of the planet forever. We should be excited that we are able to duplicate such a complex sequence of genes. Whatever you feel is morally right we should allow this to happen because if we never explore the risks then we can never enjoy the benefits. As previously stated the space exploration yielded many new technologies that will forever aid in the bettering of society. We cannot continue to prohibit the exploration of scientific study. If this practice continues then we will not be able to continue to develop advancements in the prolonging of the human species. We can't impose a ban on cloning, if we do then who is to say that we will not impose a ban on the research that will hopefully one day lead to a cure for cancer.

Any research into human cloning would eventually need to be tested on human. The ability to clone humans may lead to the genetic tailoring of offspring. The heart of the cloning debate is concerned with the genetic management of a human embryo before it begins development. It is conceivable that scientists could alter a baby's genetic codes to give the individual a certain color of eyes or genetic resistance to certain diseases. This is viewed as inappropriate, some look at it as playing God. Cloning might be used to create a "perfect human," or one with above normal strength and sub-normal intelligence, a genetic underclass. Also, if cloning were perfected in humans, there w

Some common words found in the essay are:
God Imagine, God Cloning, Neil Armstrong's, , Epsilon Class, Brave World, Alpha Class, quality life, playing god, improving quality life, improving quality, advancements improving quality, cloning advancements improving, life playing god, impose ban, prolong life, beneficial society, playing god cloning, single virus, genetic makeup, entire population, life playing,
Approximate Word count = 1101
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)