unconstitutional, therefore, must be restricted speech. Catherine A. MacKinnon, in her book

“Only Words” gives persuading evidence that pornography subordinates women as a group

through sexual abuse. She says “Protecting pornography means protecting sexual abuse as

speech, at the same time that both pornography and it’s protection have deprived women of

speech, especially speech against pornography (MacKinnon, 9). MacKinnon argues this bye

explaining defamation and discrimination, racial and sexual harassment, and equality and

Women are sexually abused for the making of pornography. Torture, rape, hot wax

dripping over nipples, and murdering women are the tools to produce a product of evil.

Literature is the description of these crimes against humanity (emphasized) and cameras are

On the assumption that words have only a referential relation to reality, pornography

is defended as only words-even when it is pictures women had to directly used to

make, even when the means of writing are women’s bodies, even when a women is

the pornographic materials are construed as ideas, and the First Amendment protects ideas.

treatment concept, pornography is illegal. ( I just have to prove it now) Also, is there not

allow her respect. It does not allow respect for women as a whole, living among men as a

Pornography clearly resembles the theory of Dominance. The important difference

Pornography is disparate impact on women, because of the sexual abuse, and ironically the

Some common words found in the essay are:
Catherine MacKinnon, Fem Juris, MacKinnon Women, Title Seven’s, Taub167 Pornography, WORDS Constitutionally, sexual abuse, disparate impact, speech pornography, premeditating rape, rape pornography, “how to” guides, seen fantasy, relation reality, protected speech, to” guides, women sexual, women sexual abuse,
Approximate Word count = 928
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)