crack in the box
To summarize the essay, Crack in the Box, you have to understand the writer and what he is saying, or the point he is trying to make. In the article Crack in the Box The writer Pete Hammil compares the difference between Television and the common street drug known as Crack Cocaine. The essay starts with a story of a young lady hooked on drugs and living in poverty with a couple of children. The children are almost hypnotized by the television as Hamill is interviewing her. As Pete Hammil is walking back to his office he is thinking about all the drug problems in the world and how there affecting society today and comes to a claim which is a claim of cause. Hamill's claim is actually a whole paragraph when he is thinking about the drug problem and the 60,s to the present and concludes that there was one major difference between that time and this, "Television".The claim that is made in the essay Crack in the Box is simple, which is a claim of cause along with sub claims of facts. The claims of cause is stated by relating the 60's to today when the drug movement started. The facts with that claim are that in the 60's the drug problem was small and insignificant, now the drug problem is h
Hamill, Pete "Crack in the Box" in Perspectives in Argument. Nancy. V .Wood. There is allot of comparison to back up the claim such as The increased sales of televisions from the 1960's to the present. In the 60's there were 31,700,000 television sets in the country, which has doubled 6 times over to an amazing 184 million T.V. sets . Now the comparison of Crack and Television comes more into play when Pete Hammil suggests that people "embraced it, were diverted by it, perhaps even loved it, but they weren't formed by it." That is a good sub claim to link television and Crack cocaine together because when people do crack they become addicts, or want more and more, which seems to be the same thing television is doing. Another claim of fact is that in the 60's there were only 1,234 drug arrests which climbed to a staggering 43,901 drug arrests in the 80's. The amounts confiscated by law enforcement has increased. In the 60s there were 97 ounces of cocaine confiscated in one year . Now it's increased to hundreds of pounds a year. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall , 1998. pg. 599-603 The support of the main claim of cause is that there are disturbing similarities as stated in the essay by Pete Hammil. How Mr. Hammil states that "Television itself is a consciousness altering instrument." That says that you can escape reality with the touch of a button, which, is
Some common words found in the essay are:
Pete Hammil, Crack Box, Bush Americans, Crack Cocaine, George Bush, Hammil Television, pete hammil, Prentice Hall, crack box, Crack Television, sub claim, Pete Hamill, Nancy Wood, claim policy, essay pete, claim cause, sub claim policy, crack cocaine, stated throughout essay, drugs story, escape reality, difference television, essay pete hammil, story sub claim, ethos pathos logos,
Approximate Word count = 938
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
