The Death Penalty 3
In view of the ever-increasing violent crimes, most people think that the re-enforcement of the death penalty is a good way to reduce the crime rate. However, there are not many statistics that prove this. For this reason, I believe that the death penalty should not be restored. In my essay I will concentrate on three main arguments for my point of view. First of all, no one has the right to terminate the life of another person; secondly, the death penalty is final and irreversible; and thirdly, there is no evidence to show that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than any other form of punishment.First of all, we know that no one has the right to terminate the life of another person. From religion's view, use of the death penalty is morally wrong. They believe that everyone has a chance to have a new life. Also, it is also against human rights. It is cruel and inhumane punishment. The idea of putting a living person to death, cold and dispassionately, is surely distasteful to the civilized society in the late twentieth century. The death penalty is final and irreversible. Innocent people, once executed, can never be brought back to life. For example, we know that there is at least one case in recent years, in Brita
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, China Singapore, Thailand Singapore, death penalty, restoration death penalty, restoration death, penalty deters crime, deters crime effectively, death penalty deters, crime effectively, deters crime, penalty deters, crime rate, light sentences imposed, life person, penalty final, final irreversible, sentences imposed,
Approximate Word count = 819
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
