The Death Penalty 3
A detailed Summary of The Death Penalty 3
In view of the ever-increasing violent crimes, most people think that the re-enforcement of the death penalty is a good way to reduce the crime rate. However, there are not many statistics that prove this. For this reason, I believe that the death penalty should not be restored. In my essay I will concentrate on three main arguments for my point of view. First of all, no one has the right to terminate the life of another person; secondly, the death penalty is final and irreversible; and thirdly, there is no evidence to show that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than any other form of punishment.
First of all, we know that no one has the right to terminate the life of another person. From religion's view, use of the death penalty is morally wrong. They believe that everyone has a chance to have a new life. Also, it is also against human rights. It is cruel and inhumane punishment. The idea of putting a living person to death, cold and dispassionately, is surely distasteful to the civilized society in the late twentieth century.
The death penalty is final and irreversible. Innocent people, once executed, can never be brought back to life. For example, we know that there is at least one case in recent years, in Brita

On the other hand, some people argue that the criminals are a financial burden to society. For example, society would need to build more guarded prisons if the crime rate rises. So, this will waste the taxpayer's money. However, this argument is irrelevant. I think that government should take the responsibility to take care them. We know that human rights are every human's right. So, they should be given the chance to attribute to society for their crimes.
Moreover, there is no evidence to show that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than any other punishment, although, some people think that the restoration of the death penalty is a means to reduce the crime rate. Actually, we must know the root of increasing crime rates rather than the punishment. For this reason, the true causes of violence and crime lie in poor living conditions, poor education, lack of opportunity, absence of care and affection in the family, and social problems. Therefore, light sentences imposed on criminals have no relationship with the increasing rate of crimes. In some societies, such as China and Singapore, there are still high rates of crimes, although they have the death penalty, it is not a solution to the problem
Some common words found in the essay are:
, China Singapore, Thailand Singapore, death penalty, restoration death penalty, restoration death, penalty deters crime, deters crime effectively, death penalty deters, crime effectively, deters crime, penalty deters, crime rate, light sentences imposed, life person, penalty final, final irreversible, sentences imposed,
Approximate Word count = 819
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
Category: Miscellaneous
Saved Paper
Newest Essays
- My Personal Value System
- Iraq and High Energy...
- The Development of English...
- Critique of a Research...
- Visiting the Elderly in...
- Ad Critique: Peters, Jeremy...
- Catell's Structure-Based...
- Current Diabetes Epidemic:...
- Job Search: Push Pull...
- Proposal: Social...
Testimonials
-
"Thank You So Much!!! You have saved me once again!!!"
Jack M. -
"With so many papers to chose from, I was able to get ideas to help me with all of my classes. Thank You!"
Brian P. -
"I've used this site for the last 3 years to help me come up with ideas for my papers."
Sara J. -
"I use this site every week to help me write my own papers!"
Rachel W. -
"I love this site!!!"
Marie N.
