new world order
The idea of a New World Order has been around for a long time. This ideal centers around the concept of a one world government led by the United Nations. Many have praised the idea of a New World Order, including some of our very own Presidents of the United States, while other stand against the idea all together. In theory the idea of a one world government would be nice, uniting the world as one, however the shortcomings, in my opinion, out weigh the positive factors. In 1989, the Cold War ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the post-war ordeals ended only two years later with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Kosovo crisis has tagged an end to ten years of disorder and uncertainty with international politics and a breakthrough of a new order for the up and coming century. Today the world is dominated by the idea of economic globalisation, that must be backed up by a new global security arrangement. (http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr) A suggested idea for the 21st century government has been the ideology of the New World Order, one world government lead by the United Nations. It would create new forms of global economics, global politics and overlapping and diminishing cultures.
The economic system would be based financial and momentary supported by the New World Order. State borders would be either severely reduced or erased in order to create a one-world government for the New World Order. Some or all this may sound quite appealing but it would come with many strings attached, many consequences and many drawbacks. The concept of globalization, both economically and otherwise, will prove to cause another set of major problems. States identities as well as their sovergnity will be undermined if not lost all together. It would cause for the abolishment of states and combining cultures. Since sovereignty would now not lie solely with the states there could possibly be a new concept of a world wide system of limited sovergnity, which might possibly lead to a another concept of a sovereign individual. .(http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr) The Trilateral Commission alone is meeting and planning to "ultimately abolish the sovereignty of nations and establish one-world government," as reported by David Mills. The establishment is considered a group of "global elite" that run today's world. They are comprised of "high-level corporate and public-policy types" from the three major geographic areas. Members of the commission include former Presidents George Bush and Jimmy Carter and current President Bill Clinton. Although membership is not a secret, it is more of a "club for people who run the world anyway." By this definition the smaller ad less powerful countries are left out, violating the ideas of equality and sovereignty.(Mills) Internet. Online. http://ww.vuw.ac.nz/atp/atricles/Luke_9608.html. Mills, David. "Beware the Trilateral Commission! The Influential World Panel Conspiracy Theorists Love to Hate." The Washington Post. 25 April, 1992. Internet. Online. http://www.newdawnmagazine.com.au/49c.htm.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Rights Citizen, John Cavanagh, United Nations, Natural Law, Union Kosovo, CFR Council, David Mills, Bill Clinton, United America, Presidents United, one-world government, idea world, internet online, trilateral commission, world government, today's modern world, world democracy, creating one-world, upholding laws, global government, modern world, creating one-world government,
Approximate Word count = 1426
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
