One Person can make the Difference
It was Thomas Carlyle who believed that one person could change the course of events in history. He strongly believed that it was because of the individuals' greatness that led the people into their outcomes, not historical circumstances, which Carl Marx would argue. Napoleon Bonaparte is a perfect example of individual greatness. Carlyle said, "It is not a lucky word, this name "impossible"; no good comes of those who have it so often in their mouths."ΠThe word impossible was not a familiar word to Napoleon. He was successful in what he tried to achieve because he let nothing stand in his way. Could someone, like Napoleon, truly stand as an individual and change the course of history? Yes, and it happened. Napoleon was just one of many leaders who led his people, and changed history forever. Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1769 and died May 5, 1821. During that time he rose to be one of the greatest leaders that France ever had. Napoleon created political alliances and seized control of the French Government. He made changes in all areas, including government, religion and education. He made a new constitution as well as setting up a Continental System. Napoleon led France to many victories, which was his key
Napoleon and Hitler had one thing in common. As leaders, they both knew how to use and manipulate their people. Both had goals they felt they needed to accomplish. The differences between Napoleon's goals and Hitler's were that Napoleon wanted to instill liberty among his people with him ruling over them, and Hitler wanted to make a "perfect" race by wiping out any other race that didn't meet his standards. Both manipulated their people to get what they wanted. As for Alexander the Great, his idea of building the greatest empire was just as egotistical as Hitler's idea of building the perfect race. However, his ideas of spreading awareness about the Greek culture were short from narcissistic. The ideas were introduced by these leaders and would have never had happened if they were not allowed to become the power over their country. No one would know about Liberalism if Napoleon didn't step in and introduce it to everyone. Even if someone else tried to introduce the idea it wouldn't have been effective because they wouldn't have the same power over the people that Napoleon gained. If Hitler didn't gain access to brainwash people with his ideas of propaganda, then he wouldn't have had enough support to accomplish what he did and therefore the massacres of Jews wouldn't have happened.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Napoleon Europe, Liberalism Napoleon, Napoleon Bonaparte, Maybe French, Hitler's Napoleon, Napoleonic Empire, Hitler Adolf's, Alexander Napoleon, God Napoleon, Thomas Carlyle, napoleon won, people napoleon, idea building, napoleonic empire, napoleon bonaparte, trust people, manipulate people, countries conquered, perfect race, led people,
Approximate Word count = 1128
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
