The Nature of Conflict between Political Life and Philosophy
In Plato's writings of Socrates' episodes of dialogue, a dispute between politics and philosophy arises, namely, an argument between Socrates and the political constituents of Athens, Greece. Of these two competitors of discussion, the views are on the perspective of justice on the basis of ethics and justice on the basis of equality. The nature of this controversy tends to be somewhat passive aggressive in a sense that Socrates' arguments are presented in a remarkably calm manner while the retaliating voices of response are aggressive due to the fact that the opposing remarks to Socrates' reasoning are illegitimate "blows below the belt." With the human nature of mankind, it is highly doubtful that these two outlooks on the subject of justice are compatible with each other. The conflict between politics and philosophy are seemingly irresolvable on account that the reasoning of proper ethics of punishment and the written rules of the Athens' religion enhanced code of laws are basically a cancellation by themselves. In The Apology, Socrates is on trial for the crime of teaching the young men of Athens "un-Athenian" ways of life and for supposedly not having faith in the Athenian gods. In reality, Socrates was said to ha
filled bashings while Socrates remains in a nonchalant manner while raising his questions to the jury and accusers. Nevertheless, the presentation of the scenes are given in a way that shows the clever Socrates making logical and level-headed notes while the opposition states irrational comments to down Socrates on the jealousy they contain for his wisdom. Socrates statements are that of contradictory arguments made to his accusers or fellow arguers. Perhaps that it is possible for the conflict of politics and philosophy to be resolved, but it seems to be impossible for the conflict of philosophy to agree with the likes of the men who run the political life to be resolved. philosophizing the Athenian society. Obviously this questioning of his local culture and religion was to be an utter travesty to the politicians of the community. Socrates' young colleagues were said to have been the victims in this case by having been corrupted by their alleged teacher. When Socrates is said to have quoted the Athenian government, as an evil that he has had to avoid in his life, not only was he sought upon on the mockery of the court but of the Athenian gods as well. The relation of his philosophizing to politics seemed to just ridicule political life. In Socrates' philosophizing with his followers, the discussion is a matter of questioning which asks why and why not. In the day an age of ancient Athens, this impiety of his was a great crime to commit. Even through out the trial in The Apology, Socrates still contends to philosophize to the accusers. When Socrates proposes the question to Miletus of who makes the young better? Miletus replies to him that the laws make them better, Socrates then restates that he said whom rather than what, Miletus comes back to
Some common words found in the essay are:
Apology Socrates, Socrates Tharsymachus, Athens Greece, Crito Socrates, Socrates Plato, Socrates Escape, Oddly Socrates, , Book Republic, political life, socrates escape, politics philosophy, laws socrates, definition justice, death socrates, apology socrates, escape unjust, justice injustice, socrates' reasoning, conflict politics philosophy,
Approximate Word count = 1193
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
