Evolution remains so controversial primarily because it is part of a larger debate over nature and the meaning of life. The study of how life began almost inevitably raises questions of why: Why did life begin? Why are humans rational? Why is there order in the universe? Men and women have debated these questions for thousands of years, considering them to be some of the most important inquiries human beings can undertake (Levy, Karst, West, 132).

Is Creation Science scientific, irreligious, and factual, thus constitutionally permissible to teach in public schools?

Can creation science be taught without promoting a particular religious belief, especially that human beings were created by a supernatural entity?

Would academic freedom be gained by implementation of the act?

Is the Balanced Treatment Act constitutional under Establishment Clause? Or does it have a non-secular purpose by promoting religion?

B. Creation Science is scientific and non-religious. Read pg 113

Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, Creation Science, Establishment Clause, Estb Clause, APPELLEE Harder, Read Pg, Epperson AR, Precdural Constitutional, Division LA, Instruction Act, creation science, academic freedom, public schools, summary judgment, read pg, estb clause, lower court, tripart test, supreme court, creation science taught, science scientific, court hold teaching, implications court hold, hold teaching creationism, evolution public schools,
Approximate Word count = 881
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)