The Effect of Landmark Supreme Court Cases on Juvenile Justice
The Effect of Landmark Supreme Court Cases on Juvenile JusticeThesis: In the past juvenile offenders were held to the same standards and sanctions as adult offenders. The juvenile justice system has changed in the past 100 years as result of several case laws. The Effect of Landmark Supreme Court Cases on Juvenile Justice Three women simultaneously have their purse snatched on three different streets. The ages of the offenders are 12, 16 and 19 years. Police arrest all three. Will all three offenders be processed in the same manner? The answer is no. In the past, juvenile offenders were held to the same standards and sanctions as adult offenders. The juvenile justice system has changed in the past years as a result of several landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions (Samaha 593
After several appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case and held the lower court's decision. The U.S. Supreme court said it would be a mistake to require juries in a juvenile trial. Juvenile trials are fact finding functions, not to determined guilt or innocence. However, the decision did not prohibit jury trials in the juvenile justice system. Certain states do allow jury trials for juveniles (Feld 139-140). The fifth and fourteenth Amendments protect citizens from double jeopardy. But does the double jeopardy extend to the juvenile adjudication? In the 1971 case Breed v. Jones, a complaint was filed against Jones alleging that he committed robbery. During the adjudicated hearing, Jones was declared delinquent. At a later dispositional hearing, Jones was determined to be unfit for treatment as a juvenile and transferred to adult court. As an adult, Jones was convicted of first degree robbery (Schmalleger 547). Samaha, Joel, ed. Criminal Justice. New York: West Publishing New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. One of the first courts during the Middle Ages to have some jurisdiction over juveniles were Chancery Courts. These courts normally had concerns only over property rights. However, the authority of these court extended to the guardianship of the children. These courts were founded on the idea that children were under the protection of the King. This was the idea that popularized the Latin word "parens patriae". "Parens patriae" referred to the role of the King as the father of his country. This concept was probably used by the English kings to justify their intervention in the lives of children (Stinchcomb 504).
Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, Washington DC, Gault Lewis, Chancery Courts, Joseph Mckeiver, Court Act, Juvenile Justice, Gregory Martin, Breed Jones, Family Court, supreme court, juvenile justice, juvenile court, court ruled, brief result, justice system, juvenile court act, court act, criminal justice, juvenile justice system, adjudicated delinquent, adult court, west publishing co, court court ruled, landmark supreme court,
Approximate Word count = 1890
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)
|