2. Bilevel approach to moral rights: Upper level: Desire free & rational, get full moral rights; Lower level: All other agents get dimensional rights base on, for ex, vulnerability to pain & death or conventional rights. Strength: Free & rational; Weakness: Give up universal rights.

3. Potentiality approach to moral rights: The beings w/the potentiality to

1. Natural caring: are the feelings of universal morality. Ethics caring: is created by natural caring, accepts & sustains natural caring. Ethics caring dependent upon the natural caring because natural caring is universal and ethics caring is inside of it.

2. We are not obligated to care for starving children who fall outside our "inner circle" in an ethics of caring because we have to feed the inside our "inner circle" first, our "inner circles" adequately as "ones-caring" or "caring one" and receiving the other calls on our obligations will be limited quite naturally. And not obligated to care for others when completing such caring could require abandoning the inner circle

2. Only the only motivate w/ moral value is one directed by a rational respect for duty: Duty is the soul of morality & soul of motivation. If your moti

Some common words found in the essay are:
Kantian Ethics, , Strength Free, Strength Satisfaction, moral rights, ethics caring, natural caring, pleasure happiness, free rational, inner circle, approach moral, obligated care, innocent child, universal rights, approach moral rights,
Approximate Word count = 561
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)