of execution used by the state of Florida. It has served as a valid execution tool for the

last seventy-five years and there is no reason why it should not continue to do so. In the

editorial, "New 'Old Sparky' isn't Acceptable," Earl Maucker suggests that electrocution

should be replaced with lethal injection. He talks about how lethal injection is more

technologically modernized and more humane for that matter. Secondly, it is stated that

five out of seven Florida Supreme Court justices have urged lawmakers to consider an

alternative method to execution in 1997. Furthermore, thirty-two states are currently

using lethal injection as a form of execution.

This article expresses the editor's feelings towards the electric chair. His view is

very clear stating that he is not in favor of this type of execution and would rather see it

more humane, but after committing murder, a convict deserves a fierce death penalty.

suggests alternative actions such as lethal injections. Nevertheless, his view is very bias

electric chair is still the better execution method of the two for the state of Florida.

state of Florida. After all, it has proved itself for the last seventy-five years and is very

evident trough his use of bias opinions. He shows these one-sided beliefs through exerps

Some common words found in the essay are:
Georgia Nebraska, Sentinel Maucker, Earl Maucker, Supreme Court, Electrocution Regardless, Furthermore Maucker, electric chair, lethal injection, execution method, electric chair remain, chair remain source, lethal injection humane, source execution florida, execution 1997, five seven, earl maucker, form execution, one-sided beliefs, execution florida, remain source execution, injection humane,
Approximate Word count = 660
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)