As of being a Northern Illinois farmer part of the free soil party I would agree with my northern party and deny Dredd the right's to bring this case to court due to my raciest ideas. It should not be that Dred Scott nor any African-American have the right to hold government office, vote or sit in on juries. With all do respect to the southerners I oppose abolitionism, and believe in the individual liberty and equal rights

The slavery debate presented me with two very important questions: how should fugitives from slavery be treated in jurisdictions where slavery was illegal, and should a slave brought into a free state by his master be viewed as free? The first question that I agreed upon, was partially addressed by Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution and by the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850.

Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution required runaway slaves to be returned to their masters, without specifying how it was to be done. This may seem right to the southerners but the injuring or killing a human being because of not wanting torturous horrendous work should be no crime and for that matter there should be no law stating that a slave should be returned to there owner. Also the Fugitive Slave Act

Some common words found in the essay are:
Dred Scott, , IV Section, Supreme Court, Missouri Virginia, Slave Acts, Northern Illinois, Slave Act, Court March, dred scott, fugitive slave, free soil, Article IV, article iv, section 2 constitution, iv section, 2 constitution, supreme court, section 2, slave acts, article iv section, iv section 2, fugitive slave acts, northern party,
Approximate Word count = 541
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)