(4) Form of purpose focuses on the object and is not primarily involved with experiencing the subject. Because of this I will not go into detail on Kant's concept of form of purposive. Kant does say that the form not the purpose evokes the beauty experience. (D)

Finally, Kant argues that, "there can be no rules by which someone could be compelled to acknowledge that something is beautiful." No one can use reason or principles to talk us into a judgment on whether some garment, house, or flower is beautiful." By making a judgment of taste we lay claim to subjective universality, while the judgment is entirely internal, within the observer, we require others to agree. To understand why someone cannot be compelled to acknowledge that something is beautiful we must understand how pure aesthetic judgments are formed and how they lay claim to universality. As I have stated previously Kant believed that pure judgments of beauty must be independent of interest or indifferent to the objects existence, purely a subjective experience that is entirely internal, and singular judgments based on universal validity. If we can truly make a pure judgment of taste, that is a judgment that is disinterested in the object and free of concepts, then it seems to be impossible that someone could use rules, reasons, or principles to talk us into a judgment of whether something is beautiful. One reason why someone cannot use rules, reasons, or principles is that pure judgments of beauty do not refer to anything in this world instead they are singular judgments that are purely a subjective experiences. For example, when we identify birds in nature we look at certain characteristics and how those characteristics differ or resemble each other in order to be able to classify different species. These characteristics range from color, shape, dimensions etc... There are indeed rules by which we classify certain classes of birds, and these rules can be applied in the event that a new species is discovered. However, we do not apply rules in the same sense to beautiful objects and to do so seems illogical. Kant argued that an aesthetic judgments claim is exemplary: the beautiful object is an outstanding instance of a 'rule' that we cannot describe. (85) These rules do not exist; we have no logical way of determining rules that would enable us to identify a third case of beauty when confronted with two other objects that were determined previously to be beautiful.

Second, Kant puts forward the theory that aesthetic judgments are purely subjective experiences. Kant believes that when we judge something as beautiful, the judgme

Some common words found in the essay are:
Critique Judgment, Finally Kant, Kant Kant, pure aesthetic, aesthetic judgment, pure aesthetic judgment, judgment taste, principles talk judgment, reasons principles, talk judgment, kant argues, principles talk, compelled acknowledge beautiful, reasons principles talk, beautiful judgment, purely subjective, judgment beauty, talk judgment beautiful,
Approximate Word count = 1769
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)