Comparison between Federalist and Antifederalist views
When evaluating the balance between Federalist and Anti-Federalist influence in the United States, one must also have a firm understanding on the basis of their views as they apply to the Constitution itself. The first mention of Federalism was in the 17th century, though strictly in religious terms at that point. The word itself comes from the Latin word foederatus, meaning bound by treaty. Federalism as a tool is simply put, a way to link separate states together by a national government to achieve common goals that would have otherwise been impossible to them. It can be argued that, while both opposing viewpoints are completely contradictory in nature, the fact remains that both sides believed with absolute certainty that they acted out of the purest sense of goodness and integrity. Originally, all of the nation's Founding Fathers, as they all were men, held a similar view of how their country should be run however radical it may have seemed at the time. Charles A. Beard, a professor of politics once said, "You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence". "
A great accomplishment by the Anti-federalists that shapes the present American government is the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another. Anti-federalists also waged for a Bill of Rights that would protect the common man from being abused by the Government. Against this, the Federalists waged a great struggle. "A listing of rights can be a dangerous thing," it was said, "If the national government were to protect specific listed rights, what would stop it from violating rights other than the listed ones?" Since we can't list all the rights, the Federalists argued that it's better to list none at all. At that time, the Federalists slowly began to lose power. With the Embargo Act of 1807, many merchants were caused a substantial economic loss to those cities based at ports. Due to poor communication and an increasing number of dissatisfaction in the merchant classes, the Federalist Party was not able to appropriately express their feelings and concerns. For their failure in 1807, the party was defeated in the 1808 elections after losing Pennsylvania and Vermont to the Anti-federalists. The party, nearing its official end, did not present a presidential candidate in 1820, and within four years it was virtually gone. It has always been and will always remain a balance with government. It is about how much freedom the individual is willing to give up versus the amount of safety that individual wants. Sure, taxes are paid, but that's to be expected for all the benefits that each citizen receives. As Ronald Reagan once said, "The taxpayer -- that's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination". It all depends Anti-federalists are also largely responsible for the legislative branch of go
Some common words found in the essay are:
Federalists Instead, Federalist Anti-Federalist, Charles Beard, Founding Fathers, Party Anti-federalist, Originally Congress, Government Transportation, Government Federalists, Constitution Federalists, Jeffersonian Democracy, federal government, bill rights, founding fathers, national government, strong central government, charles beard, federalist papers, alexander hamilton, james madison, john jay, power hungry,
Approximate Word count = 1311
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
