Evolution
Ever since the publication of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species was published, there has been an ongoing debate between science and religion. Scientists have formulated many theories as to the origins of man and to the creation of the earth, whereas religious groups have one main creation theory, based on the "Genesis" story of The Bible. These theories, however, are not the cause of the debate because the different theories are simply myths meant to explain the unknown. The debate is caused by different belief systems. The main difference between creationists and scientists is the way they fight this debate. Creationists have developed their own science: Creation Science. Creation scientists look to prove that creation is right and science is wrong, providing selective interpretations of the fossil record. But their interpretations are exaggerated and foolish. Creationists will pick one scientific theory and do everything they can to point out it's flaws, disregarding wh!at they can't prove wrong. They will often use emotions to control the public to their side. They spend their time trying to discover false evolution rather than teaching their beliefs
e will believe what they choose. Religious believers have a tendency to believe that only their theories can be correct. Scientists believe their own theories, but will abandon them if a new theory comes along with better evidence to support it. Creationists only have one source to prove their theory correct: the genesis story. They believe simply through faith in The Bible. Scientists, on the other hand, have an abundance of fossil skulls, fauna, and other biological and ecological specimens to prove that evolution exists. Scientists work to prove their theories wrong in order to find the true answers. The creation science argument has constantly said that what they do is use scientific evidence to show that creation happened, but what they are really doing is trying to prove evolution wrong. "Evolution, properly understood, can only enrich and add to our faith in a loving, dynamic creator. Evolution does indeed exist, but only because God created it." A major argument is tha! e other has to be ultimately proved beyond the shadow of a doubt. But, there is an incredibly small chance of that happening. Even if it were to happen, to prove either side, there would still be disbelievers and those who think the evidence is a hoax. References Cited: Bible, The 1995. King James Version. Harper Paperbacks, New York. Conroy, Glenn C. 1997. Reconstructing Human Origins. WW Norton & Company, New York. Dawkins, Richard. 1995. River Out of Eden. BasicBooks, HaperCollins, New York. Mirsky, Steven D. 1988. "Standing on the Shoulders of Midgets" The Humanist, Jan/Feb 1988(11, 42). Morris, Henry M. and Parker, Gary E. 1987. What is Creation Science?. Master Books, El Cajon, CA. to the general public. The theory of evolution removes humans from the center of the universe, and religious followers can't believe that their God, who created us in his image (Bible, 2), would allow that. The creationist arguments can be summed up in one example from the Morris -Parker book. They state "Evolution is claimed to be 'scientific,' and still going on, so it seems like it should be observable and measurable. Yet after 150 years of intense study of biological variations, evolutionists are still completely in the dark
Some common words found in the essay are:
Bible Scientists, Science Creation, Jimmy Swaggart, Morris Parker, Origin Species, Humanist Jan/Feb, creation science, Mirsky Steven, Parker Gary, Conroy Glenn, Dawkins Richard, creation scientists, science creation, human origins ww, ww norton company, glenn 1997, 1997 reconstructing, paperbacks york, reconstructing human, york conroy, conroy glenn, company york dawkins, norton company york, human origins, origins ww norton,
Approximate Word count = 1489
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
