Can the information produced by it become a beneficial asset or a moral evil?

For example distinction the use of the X chromosome e, in a genetic race or class markers can be used for the identification of a persons ethnicity or class.

A seemingly harmless collection of information from the advancement of the Human Genome Project. But, lets assume this information is used to explore ways to deny entry into countries, determine social class, or even who gets preferential treatment. Can the outcome of this information effect the moral standards of a society?

Genome Project. To better understand these topics a careful dissection of the terminology must be made. Webster's Dictionary defines morality as ethics, upright conduct, conduct or attitude judged from the moral standpoint. It also defines a moral as concerned with right and wrong and the distinctions between them. A Genome is "the total of an individuals genetic

material," including, "that part of the cell that controls heredity" Subsequently, "research and technology efforts aimed at mapping and sequencing large portions or entire genomes are called the answers to the above and many other questions a

found to be packed into chromosomes, of which 23 pairs existed in each cell of the human body. Furthermore, one chromosome of each pair is donated from each parent. DNA was also found to be made of nucleotide chains made of four bases, commonly represented by A, C, T, and G. Any ordered pair of bases makes a sequence. These sequences are the instructions that produce molecules, proteins, for cellular structure and biochemical functions. In relation, a marker is any location on a chromosome where inheritance can be identified and tracked

Genes: Genome Projects: How Big, How Fast?, Johns Hopkins University

Lee, Thomas F., The Human Genome Project: Cracking the Genetic Code of Life,

Press:Congress of the United Mapping Our Baltimore,1988.

Gert, Bernard, Morality and the New Genetics: A Guide for Students and Health

change in the rules causes acceptance; morality can be viewed not as an evil by the public perception but as a decision backed by common morals. Based on the pattern of common morality the issues of genetic race or class distinction or any other controversies involving the Human Genome Project can be put to a set of common moral standards. Just like the moral standard that says killing is wrong but killing is justifiable in self-defence, the Human Genome

(202). Markers can be expressed areas of genes (DNA) or some segment of DNA with no known coding function but an inheritance could be traced (3). It is these markers that are used to do genetic mapping. By the use of genetic mapping isolated areas of DNA are used to find if a person has a specific trait, inherent factor, or any other numerous genetic information. In conclusion, the genetic history of ancient selective breeding to Mendel's garden peas to the current isolation of genes has been reached only through collaborative data of many

Any attempt to resolve moral issues involving new information from the Human Genome Project requires direct, clear, and total understanding of common moralit

Some common words found in the essay are:
Genome Project, Mendel Austrian, Webster's Dictionary, human genome, genome project, human genome project, Human Genome, common morality, Medical Institute, genetic history, Press Berkeley, Press York, public perception, public system, genome projects, individuals public, moral standards, Lappe Marc, Hopkins University, events genetic history, analysis dna, public perception common, common morality based, project structure project,
Approximate Word count = 1339
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)