our society, the primary influences have been for the negative rather than for the positive. It is possible for good people to allow a negative environment to flourish by merely not acting or opposing the negative forces. Philosophers, over the years, h

In my opinion, a great percentage of the population believes that one person is powerless to influence the world. People use this excuse all the time and it leads people to not vote, serve in the army, or even pay taxes. This theory is wrong and there are so many examples to disprove it. One person that comes to mind is Hitler. He made a huge impact on the destruction of the world. How can anyone say that one person can not make a difference when because of ONE human being over eight million people were brutally murdered. Another example of one person making a difference would be a woman who has eight children and is not able to afford them. Rather than thinking of the consequences and using birth control, which are now free, she just keeps having kids. This results in her having to live on welfare and sponge off the government and the taxes of the more responsible part of society. The author's theory is that an individual can either help or hurt the community in d!

rastic ways. I agree with the author that if just a few people in the world decided to help change the country, it would improve, maybe just a little or maybe a lot depending on the individuals. If the entire world had this philosophy then it would completely turn the world around. Because few people want to take the hard way, by stepping up and taking responsibility, the world continues i

Some common words found in the essay are:
Tony Evans, Future Difference, Alexander Pope, person difference, jury duty, help change, example person, world people, hurt community, ,
Approximate Word count = 927
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)