Should Cloning be legal
For years, part of the American public, and humans in general, have been fascinated with the possibility of creating human life by other than natural means. Cloning alters the very meaning of humanity; it is morally, ethically, and spiritually wrong. Many strongly disagree with the idea of human cloning. It certainly was not surprising when scientists were able to clone a sheep and it will not be surprising if someday scientists will be able to clone a human being. Should cloning for human benefits or even human cloning itself be allowed in society today? That is a question we must ask ourselves.On one side of the issue are those who believe that human cloning should be permitted. Those who are opposed to a ban on cloning believe that human cloning research could bring substantial benefits, including the development of new treatments for cystic fibrosis and other diseases, as well as the ability to create animal with normal compatible organs for transplants. (Strode, NP). Another reason is what could happen if cloning is banned. Death, disease, disability, and indignity would result from imposing limits on cloning discoveries and advances (Carey, 32). What might possibly happen if cloning is bann
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ed? Scientists as well as experts believe that efforts to ban cloning could drastically stop the creation of new medicines that would help millions of people. It has been said and debated that scientists should not take the work of God into their own hands. If they do so, the only problem that could arise, is that the age-old concept of "father and mother" could be destroyed. God meant for us to reproduce sexually. If he wanted humans to clone themselves, he would not have given us reproductive organs. Realistically, human cloning is just a huge step towards negativism in human lives, rather than simply being the next step in fertility technology. Also several experts said that cloning might be the only chance for many infertile couples to have their own genetically related children (Carey, 32). These cases are rarely seen, and At this point, I believe we should not use cloning. However, if we are to venture into cloning we must make many precautions. I think the best way to do this is to research the consequences. Where do we draw the line? There have to be limits and laws set as to what can be cloned and how much can be cloned. Cloning is immoral, and the only reason we are facing these problems is simply because those individuals with substantial amounts of money believe that they should be cloned; in doing so, there would be many copies of them to perpetuate their images and their ideas. It is a matter of morality and spirituality as well. (McCormick, 1148). Cloning is ethical, unless there is lack of respect for the lives of animals and human
Some common words found in the essay are:
Strode NP, Laurence Tribe, NP Getting, Legal American, Commission NBAC, human cloning, meaning humanity, human life, child born, child born cloning, cloning alter meaning, idea human cloning, mccormick 1148, scientists able clone, idea human, believe human, ban cloning, clone human, believe human cloning, carey 32,
Approximate Word count = 1106
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
