An Old Look at a New Government
Popular views of government have changed constantly throughout history. For a government to be popular and legitimate, it must meet certain intangible guidelines. These guidelines have been the topic of many an essay and book over history. Political science, and philosophy to a large extent, has attempted to define these guidelines. Both are ever ready to either praise or destroy the values that any government is based upon. The view of government, initiated in writing, very rarely examines any current government of the world. Writers often feel that the current governments are rather susceptible to trends that could deny their writing in the status quo. An author writing about history is much safer than attempting to tackle the present. History offers a realm to hypothesize about new ideas, but the present allows the only true test of whether an idea or theory is practical and substantial. Few authors have the privilege of seeing their work translated into a form of government. If this does occur it is usually a number of years after their death. Karl Marx never saw the full affect that his Communist Manifesto would have on the world. His philosophy was not truly held until after his deat
"The place of manufacture was taken by the giant, Modern Industry, the place of the industrial middle class, by industrial millionaires, the leaders of whole industrial armies, the modern bourgeoisie. Modern industry has established the world market, for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in its turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages. Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class." Marx talks about America in the sense that with each advance of industry, the bourgeoisie further advances itself politically. The further that America advances industry is the ! The government is now so immense that the general will is impossible to contrive into law. The constituents are not able to have their voices heard. The government is now no longer listening to the general will of the public, which in turn decreases it legitimacy. Marx would also continually repeat of a bourgeois control of production. The bourgeoisie are firmly in control of production. As an example, Bill Gates is so in control of the computer industry that he must attempt to prove that he does not have a monopoly. It is nearly impossible for any infant business to be able to compete within the already established market. Marx would say that our industries are too entrenched in their market share for any new companies to compete. The proletariat has no chance of competing with the bourgeoisie in the United States.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Middle Ages, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Nietzsche's Voter, Marx Rousseau, Supreme Court, , Bill Rights, Bosnia Haiti, Ruby Ridge, United Mill, united government, control production, american government, voter turnout, individual mill, karl marx, individual liberty, bourgeoisie control, control industry, recent voter turnout, rich/poor gap, john stuart mill, rich/poor gap united, proletariat gain control, bourgeoisie control 95%,
Approximate Word count = 2909
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page double spaced)
|