Perspectives on Parental Alienation, Child Custody and Dispute Resolution Systems
Perspectives on Parental Alienation, Child Custody and Dispute Resolution SystemsContested child custody provides many challenges for alternate dispute resolution. With no-fault divorce, and a standard for determining custody in light of the child's best interest, judges are besieged with a backlog of disputed custody cases without clear and concrete guidelines to follow in deciding whether to favor the mother or the father. Many experts in family law- both from the legal and mental health arenas have observed an increase in deceptive and manipulative tactics used by divorcing couples. The surge in divorce rates during the past two decades along with major judicial reforms since the 1970's has led to several significant changes in the ways that courts handle family law cases. Divorce and custody laws have been widely revised by states, and alternatives to litigation have emerged and gained prominence. Mediation has become a popular option, and in some states, mediation is mandatory for divorcing couples. Judicial systems in California, Minnesota and Wisconsin were early experimenters with the concept of conciliation courts, where parents were encouraged to work out divorce and custody conflicts. States that have introduced ma
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Clawar Rivlin, Walsh Bone, Pearson Thoennes, Custody Mediation, Secondly PAS, Description Behavior, Divorce AAMD, Dunne Hedrick, California Davis, Alienation Syndrome, mental health, alienating parent, herman 1990, gardner 1992, walsh bone, child custody, parental alienation, walsh bone 1997, bone 1997, clawar rivlin 1991, custody disputes, rivlin 1991, parental alienation syndrome, dunne hedrick 1994, alienation syndrome pas,
Approximate Word count = 10613
Approximate Pages = 42 (250 words per page double spaced)
|