animal testing
Imagine a cold dark room with cages lined against the walls. The cries of living creatures' echoes throughout the building as if the entrapped animals are able to sense their fate. Lying on a table are several rabbits strapped down with tiny cups attached to their bellies. These rabbits are going through an enormous amount of pain due to the fact that they were not given painkillers of any sort. Sadly these helpless creatures are not the ones being tested on; they are there only as a source of food for the insects that are being researched on. The practice of experimenting upon animals to gain scientific insight dates back to ancient Greece and were part of the earliest medical experiments. For centuries, doctors and researchers have used animals to enhance their knowledge about how the various organs and systems functioned, as well as to sharpen their surgical skills. Although these experiments may seem useful in the scientific community there are never the less activists on the other side of the spectrum who argue that these types of methods are cruel and unusual. Though rather controversial, the use of animals continues to grow for not only medical research, but for cosmetic purposes as well. Many scientists have uni
The Animal Welfare Act demands that anesthesia be used whenever an animal may be exposed to pain. This law has one loophole; the law does not make it necessary to use painkillers if it will affect or interfere with the results of an experiment. Throughout the years, researchers have come about with several alternatives to testing on animals. Some of these methods are not only more accurate, but are proven to be cost efficient. Some of these methods include epidemiological studies, clinical intervention trials, astute clinical observation aided by laboratory testing, human tissue and cell cultures, autopsy studies, endoscopic examination and biopsy, as well as new imaging methods. These techniques make it evident that the testing of animals is unnecessary, due to the amount of options in testing products and diseases. Throughout the years, researchers have come about with several alternatives to testing on animals. Some of these methods are not only more accurate, but are proven to be cost efficient. Some of these methods include epidemiological studies, clinical intervention trials, astute clinical observation aided by laboratory testing, human tissue and cell cultures, autopsy studies, endoscopic examination and biopsy, as well as new imaging methods. These techniques make it evident that the testing of animals is unnecessary, due to the amount of options in testing products and diseases. "In 1952, a woman dying of cancer allowed some of her cancer cells to be taken from her body. Her cancer cells started a colony of cells that provides the basis for some current experiments. Scientists have also succeeded in keeping heart cells alive and beating for almost three months. The cells have been used to test new heart drugs" (Woods 25). "In 1952, a woman dying of cancer allowed some of her cancer cells to be taken from her body. Her cancer cells started a colony of cells that provides the basis for some current experiments. Scientists have also succeeded in keeping heart cells alive and beating for almost three months. The cells have been used to test new heart drugs" (Woods 25). "With the ending of animal experimentation, a great evil will be lifted from the earth, which will have untold and far-reaching benefits for health and the life on this planet" (Kerven 69-70). Woods, Geraldine. Animal Experimentation and Testing: A Pro/Con Issue The results to some of these experiments may have also been obtained if examinations were performed on live species, on the other hand, these results could have also been inaccurate, due to the many factors dealt with while conducting these investigations. It is obvious, that animals are not like human beings. Their bodies are different from ours and they suffer from different diseases. Reactions to drugs also vary; making it evident that animals should not be used to find cures for human diseases. Since the metabolism of an animal is not like that of a human's, how could testing on animals possibly provide accurate results? (The Facts)
Some common words found in the essay are:
PETA ASPCA, , Welfare Act, Silver Springs, Unreliable Pginfonet, animal testing, testing animals, Animal Welfare, animal welfare act, animal welfare, testing products, safe products, accurate results, welfare act, Dan Law, animal tests, Alternatives Animal, results animal, harmful effects, Animals Research, Franklin Watts, rats mice birds, aware suffering animals, suffering animals exposed, public aware suffering,
Approximate Word count = 7028
Approximate Pages = 28 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
