cruelty of animal testing
Imagine a cold dark room with cages lined against the walls. The cries of living creatures' echoes throughout the building as if the entrapped animals are able to sense their fate. Lying on a table are several rabbits strapped down with tiny cups attached to their bellies. These rabbits are going through an enormous amount of pain due to the fact that they were not given painkillers of any sort. Sadly these helpless creatures are not the ones being tested on; they are there only as a source of food for the insects that are being researched on. The practice of experimenting upon animals to gain scientific insight dates back to ancient Greece and were part of the earliest medical experiments. For centuries, doctors and researchers have used animals to enhance their knowledge about how the various organs and systems functioned, as well as to sharpen their surgical skills. Although these experiments may seem useful in the scientific community there are never the less activists on the other side of the spectrum who argue that these types of methods are cruel and unusual. Though rather controversial, the use of animals continues to grow for not only medical research, but for cosmetic purposes as well. Many scientists have
Goodwin, Frederick. "Science and Self-Doubt." Reason Magazine Oct. The Animal Welfare Act was adopted in 1966 and since then the law has enabled animals to have a proper environment while in the laboratory. Although no law has been passed restricting the use of animals, the law has made it possible for millions of animals to receive pain-killers and to be placed in a clean environment where proper, pain free testing can be administered. This law states that; animals be given pain relievers when necessary, and requires exercise for dogs and attention to the mental health of monkeys and apes. In 1998, rats, mice, and birds were finally included in the Animal Welfare Act. "The Fate of rats, mice and birds is in Clinton's hands" 1 Nov. Although this strict law mandates that scientists follow the harsh regulation, many researchers choose not to comply with the orders. There are not nearly enough inspectors to keep up with each laboratories condition. In 1992, government officials selected twenty-six institutions at random to see if they were complying with regulations; out of the twenty-six inspected, twelve of them were not. "Every once in a while you run into someone who doesn't care" (Woods 47). "In an experiment done on heart disease, Milirone was once given to rats whose hearts had been artificially stopped. The drug increased the survival rate of the rats and was later used on humans. However, when the drug was administered to these people, their death rate increased by thirty percent" (Woods 50-51). The practice of experimenting upon animals to gain scientific insight dates back to ancient Greece and were part of the earliest medical experiments. For centuries, doctors and researchers have used animals to enhance their knowledge about how the various organs and systems functioned, as well as to sharpen their surgical skills. Although these experiments may seem useful in the scientific community there are never the less activists on the other side of the spectrum who argue that these types of methods are cruel and unusual. Though rather controversial, the use of animals continues to grow for not only medical research, but for cosmetic purposes as well. Many scientists have united in the belief that animal experiments are necessary in order to provide vital information in the continued effort to provide new cures and safe products. While animal testing may be important for certain medical research, certain procedures are not only unethical, but also unnecessary for obta! Many of the procedures used today to enhance society's advancement of information seem irrelevant to what is actually essential in today's world. Many experts believe that testing of products on animals, before they go on the market, is imperative to providing safe products for people who need depend on these products for their own well being. However, many activists claim that the testing of products on defenseless animals is immoral, claiming that the animals themselves have no in this process. "Vivisection is barbaric, useless and a hindrance to scientific progress." (Goodwin 22). "Animal Tests: Crude and Unreliable" Pginfo.net. 14 Nov. 2000 Cosmetic companies find animal testing most convenient for researching their latest beauty products and perfumes. Skin irritancy tests are performed by shaving the animals' hair and then rubbing the skin with the chemical being tested; The skin is checked for redness, swelling and other signs of irritation. Placing a mask around the animals face and then having the product pumped into the mask is how hair sprays, deodorants, spray cleaners and other products are tested to study the effect the product might have on a person's breathing. Many animal rights groups have formed throughout the years and have fought for the use of animals in laboratories to be banished. They have made the public aware of the suffering that the animals are exposed to and have often protested for th
Some common words found in the essay are:
PETA ASPCA, , Welfare Act, Silver Springs, Unreliable Pginfonet, Dan Law, animal testing, Alternatives Animal, testing animals, Animals Research, safe products, nov 2000, testing products, accurate results, animal welfare, Animal Welfare, Franklin Watts, welfare act, animal welfare act, animal tests, 13 nov 2000, medical research, rats mice birds, public aware suffering, aware suffering animals,
Approximate Word count = 3572
Approximate Pages = 14 (250 words per page double spaced)
|