Kant & the problem of modern philosophy
In Immaneul Kant's work, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, the principle idea or question of discussion is whether or not metaphysics is possible. Although this is clearly the objective of his argument, the author is not concerned with constructing metaphysics. Rather he uses this question as a method of articulating the problem of modern philosophy, for by creating an inquiry of the theory of metaphysics one is forced to examine its conditions of possibility. This problem of modern philosophy is based on the gap between the phenomenal and the noumenal, or the experience of reality and the knowledge of reality, as illustrated by the renowned empiricist, David Hume. According to Hume, we are fundamentally limited to the phenomenal, holding only our impressions as true based on perception. In contrast, Kant introduced the idea that the mind leaves an impression on perception, which illustrates cooperation between the mind and experience based on their conformity, t!hus explaining knowledge. This innate form has been given to us, and through time and space we are allowed a certain amount of flexibility within boundaries. The genius of Kant lies in the fact that he created an image of reality that was not possible
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Religion and the uncritical assumptions of truth would be an efficient example of this idea. We can obviously say that there was a creator, which is a material truth. However, nothing more can be stated as fact. If a further statement were made, you would be crossing the line from the phenomenal to the noumenal. Once you attempt to describe the specifics of God, it is inevitable that you will come up short, for no individual has adequately enough experienced God to develop such a conclusion. Kant's theory comes into consideration at this point for Hume's skepticism has now contradicted itself. Kant uses the three transcendental ideas of psychological, cosmological, and theological (as they were illustrated by Hume) to portray how reason systematically unifies our experience. We presume these ideas in order to allow us to philosophize through experience. In contrast, the assumption concerning the experience of God would lead us to believe that philosophy in general is irrelevant. In effect, we would become apathetic to reason, which is contrary to human nature. However, by this point we know for a fact that a material truth exists. As a result of this inconsistency, Kant ta
Some common words found in the essay are:
According Hume, Future Metaphysics, conditions possibility, understanding intuition, hume's theory, material truth, phenomenal noumenal, hume's skepticism, modern philosophy, experience god, representations accurate,
Approximate Word count = 858
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
