hus explaining knowledge. This innate form has been given to us, and through time and space we are allowed a certain amount of flexibility within boundaries. The genius of Kant lies in the fact that he created

The fact of the matter is that one can deduce from Hume's theory that knowledge derived from experience is uncertain. In all actuality, it would only take a single experience to prove the previous wrong, therefore making the aggregate preceding knowledge irrelevant. We can never know the whole of our experience because there is always the possibility of a contrasting event altering our understanding. Perhaps this best explains Hume's basis of skepticism. However, the assurance that these representations are accurate lies in the theory that material objects presuppose our experience and understanding through the use of our senses. This is relevant because we view ourselves as existing in an objective spaceo-temporal order, meaning that everything is conditional allowing thought not to be just limited to the mind.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Religion and the uncritical assumptions of truth would be an efficient example of this idea. We can obviously say that there was a creator, which is a material truth. However, nothing more can be stated as fact. If a further statement were made, you would be crossing the line from the phenomenal to the noumenal. Once you attempt to describe the specifics of God, it is

Some common words found in the essay are:
According Hume, Future Metaphysics, Cruz PSY, understanding intuition, hume's skepticism, hume's theory, phenomenal noumenal, representations accurate, material truth, modern philosophy, conditions possibility, experience god,
Approximate Word count = 862
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)