to the "personal desert." This is where someone feels that they have earned something. He uses the example that in the real world, it is difficult to get away without giving a tip because of this attitude, but in Nowheresville, a person would only be grateful for such a notion and would not be angry if they did not receive it because they did not "deserve" or earn it. The rest of the article seems to start anew, forgetting about the proposed Nowheresville, and concentrating solely on definitions. He explains the subtleties between "rights against" and "rights to" as well as the difference between making a claim, claiming that, and having a claim.

This is where I became disappointed with the article. At first, the challenge of imagining Nowheresville and what type of actions and duties were allowed without rights gave way fo

Some common words found in the essay are:
Joel Feinberg, feinberg begins, duties allowed, entail people's, rights rights,
Approximate Word count = 562
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)