Gun Control

A detailed Summary of Gun Control

Guns and Violence: The Control Dilemma

"A gun in the home is 43 times more likely to be used to kill a family member of friend than an intruder"(Gun Control Facts). This and other statistics like it prove that the United States needs to adopt a stricter gun control policy, restricting both the purchasing and ownership of guns. Although hunting and self-defense purposes involve gun use, purchasing and ownership restrictions prove necessary because of severe gun misuse, guns today prove too powerful for common use, they often endanger children, and strict gun control policies have drastically cut down on crime in other countries.

Handgun misuse causes a major problem in today's societies. People purchase handguns with the thought that the guns will only be used in self-defense. Most guns are not used for that purpose at all. Last year less than four percent of homicides resulted from self-defense reason (Bogus 188). Handguns represent only 30% of all guns but account for 90% of gun misuse (Sugarmann 252). The many examples of gun misuse go on and on. One example of gun misuse occurs when a gun fires when the safety is thought to be on. Handguns take the most lives in the form of suicides. Each year handguns result in the self-in

The NRA, or National Rifle Association, believes that suicides and accidental killings are the price of freedom. They also believe that without guns criminals would turn to other methods of violence, including using baseball bats and knives. The NRA concludes that, "A machine gun is no more deadly of a weapon than a baseball bat" (Gun Control Facts). This quote exemplifies the outrageous claims made by the NRA. The majority of U.S. citizens would not believe for a second that this statement could possibly have a speck of truth. Almost every crime could be more easily committed with a gun than a baseball bat. Consider this, if a person with a baseball bat challenged a person with a gun, who would win?

The NRA opposes gun control claiming it violates guaranteed second amendment rights. Supporters of the NRA believe that the Second Amendment gives them the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to bear arms, shall not be infringed (Bogus 203)." The previous statement does not give citizens the right to carry the biggest guns they can find. When the Constitution was written, guns were necessary for survival; they were used to kill animals for food. In 1983 the Untied States Supreme Court agreed. It stated, "Because the possession of handguns is not part of the right to keep and bear arms, gun control does not violate the Second Amendment"(Sugarmann 250).

Anti-gun control advocates point to Israel and Switzerland when asked about their views on how gun control has cut down on crime a in other countries. Both countries have extremely low crime rates and extremely high gun ownership. The NRA believes that there is no correlation between gun ownership and crime rates. What the NRA fails to tell common citizens is that all men under the age of 40 in Switzerland are required to serve in the militia and therefore have guns issued to them, and they have to account for every round of ammunition. The country itself has strict owne

Some common words found in the essay are:
Control Dilemma, Lorraine Stern, Gun Control, Israel Violence, Israel Switzerland, Moines Register, Gun Violence, Supreme Court, Supporters NRA, Spokespeople NRA, gun control, gun misuse, baseball bat, protection purposes, bear arms, family friends, guns protection purposes, strict gun, drastically cut, control policies, cut crime countries, endanger children, arms gun control, stricter gun control, arguments family friends,

Approximate Word count = 1368
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)

Category: Miscellaneous