John Locke and John Stuart Mill
Along with other noted philosophers, John Stuart Mill developed the nineteenth century philosophy known as Utilitarianism - the contention that man should judge everything in life based upon its ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. While Bentham, in particular, is acknowledged as the philosophy's founder, it was Mill who justified the axiom through reason. He maintained that because human beings are endowed with the ability for conscious thought, they are not merely satisfied with physical pleasures; humans strive to achieve pleasures of the mind as well. Once man has ascended to this high intellectual level, he desires to stay there, never descending to the lower level of existence from which he began. In Chapter 2 of Utilitarianism, Mill contends that "pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends" (Mill, 7). Before addressing his argument, Mill defines the topic, "The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, 'Utility', or th!e 'Greatest Happiness Principle', holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and th
------------------------------------------------------------------------ obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure" (Mill 8). Many have refuted Utilitarianism's ideals and declared that man can live just as well without happiness. Mill acknowledges that this may be true in theory, that men do not conduct their lives in total pursuit of happiness, they still need a gauge with which to measure morality. Happiness does not necessarily mean continuous bliss, as such experiences are often transient. Regardless, happiness to some may merely translate to being the avoidance of pain. In Utilitarianism, Mill noted, "utility includes not solely the pursuit of happiness, but the prevention or mitigation of unhappiness" (Mill 12). The pursuit of pleasure has also been condemned by critics as being little more than the promotion of one's own interests, with no regard to the happiness of others. Mill disputes this as being narrow-minded, clarifying that the pleasure principle which forms the foundation for utilitarianism, "what is right in con! mately successful in that he points out that contrary to popular belief, utilitarianism is not a completely selfish motivation that does not take into consideration the desires of others. Virtue, while not completely synonymous with happiness, is a constituent of it. Thus, it is an attribute desirable to society as a whole. One who causes pain in others cannot be described as virtuous. In the final analysis, John Stuart Mill successfully proved his view by noting that happiness is not a completely comprehensive term. It is comprised of many components and represents different things to di
Some common words found in the essay are:
Utilitarianism Mill, Stuart Mill, Happiness Principle', According Mill, pursuit happiness, happiness mill, , desirable mill, pain desirable mill, pleasure freedom pain, john stuart mill, John Stuart, freedom pain desirable, freedom pain, pleasure mill, according mill, pleasure according, utilitarianism mill, mill 16, own happiness, pleasure according mill,
Approximate Word count = 1110
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
