Mr
When we look at the Arab-Israeli conflict, we have to distinguish between two levels: the interstate conflict between Israel and the Arab states and the intra-communal conflict meaning the conflict between the two peoples. The Oslo process brought the conflict to the intra-communal level of the 1920’s, to the question of how two people can live together. The war of 1967 had been an interstate conflict; for example, Security Council Resolution 242 mentions the Palestinian people only as a refugee problem, and otherwise focuses on states, borders, etc.-, which actually was the reason for its rejection by the Palestinians at that time. In the Oslo process, the major issue was the communal problem, the search for a solution to the problem of how Israelis and Palestinians can live together. A question I would like to ask is whether you can have negotiations in a situation of unequal power like the one between the Palestinians and the Israelis. I have learned in diplomacy, there is! a need for the acceptance of fundamental norms and of the “other” as an equal partner (The Art of Diplomacy, Hobeika, 1984). These norms are generally observed because they are useful to all the states; they exist because states have a common interest in
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
ARRANGEMENTS Parties, Mahmoud Alawy-, ECONOMIC RELATIONS, United Nations, Peace Treaty, ROADS Parties, Israel Palestine, Israeli Palestinian, Peace Agreement, Abdul Hadni, west bank, holy religious, peace treaty, peace settlement, religious buildings, holy religious buildings, gaza strip, palestinian people, exchange instruments, buildings sites, exchange instruments ratification, effective measures, religious buildings sites, final peace treaty, ratification final peace,
Approximate Word count = 6471
Approximate Pages = 26 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
