None_Provided
In the music industry various artists work hard in order to make music that many people enjoy listening to. They then sell their music to record companies such as Arista, RCA, Warner Brothers, and Jive, just to name a few. These record companies make multi million-dollar deals with these artists with the intentions that once they distribute the artists' music to the record stores they will be selling a favorable amount of albums. In today's ever advancing technology, music is basically being stolen off of the Internet through mp3 databases such as Napster and Imesh. People are able to sign onto the internet, and are able to type in the name of the song, and then are able to download that particular song usually within five minutes. Now the problem becomes; how are the record companies, and most importantly the artists going to make money if their work is basically being given away on the Internet? These people who download music do not even have to leave their homes, and they can listen to the hottest, and latest music in the industry. The defense said by Napster is that they are basically advertising the music for the artist for free over the Internet. The user is in a able to sample
if they have the song on CD already: why would they go out and buy it? This hardworking artists are losing money because of the unethical databases ------------------------------------------------------------------------ distributing music that was not paid for. Many people feel that when they download the "free" MP3's that it is not stealing because they are not receiving a actual cd. Who are we kidding anyway, I myself use these free MP3 sources, and I have not bought an album in about two years. What college student in their right mind is going to go out, pay twenty-dollars for an album? Especially if they usually only like two songs from the whole album. I don't have to waste miles on my car, pay for gas to get to the actual store, and I don't have to wait in line. I can have that song in five minutes for free without even leaving my house. I believe it is unfair to artist because obviously someone out there is making it possible for poor college students like myself to download music for free. Someone should be taking action to put a stoppage to the free downloading of music. Nothing in this world is for free. According to the Information and Communications Technology Law journal, it st! topic in every sense. In order to have a economy that is healthy, and works properly; people must have the understanding that should have to pay for what they get. You cannot expect to get something for nothing because somewhere along the lines someone is getting hurt financially. 19 year old Shawn Fanning was not thinking about what he could do t
Some common words found in the essay are:
Napster Imesh, Dr Dre, Imesh People, Technology Law, Shawn Fanning, Brothers Jive, Limp Bizkit's, , record companies, Limp Bizkit, music record, databases napster, music industry, download music, Metallica Dr, metallica dr dre, music free, napster imesh, dr dre, companies money, metallica dr, music record companies, artists losing money, record companies money, databases napster imesh,
Approximate Word count = 1050
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
