argumentation
Good argument is an aspect that many choose to negate as they ponder the substances of true argument. Argument that will accomplish a specific task needs the special attention that only a well-founded arguer can offer. As we ponder these thoughts we will analyze argument by the thinkers we studied in class and then apply their perspectives according to two themes of argument: Risk and Tension. Finally, we will compare them to the argument I chose (Young White Men Scared, Entitled, and Cynical - A Deadly Combination. By Paul Kivel). When either the affirmative or negative argue with one another, certain issues of respect and standards must be followed. An arguer cannot merely attempt to brutally attack his opposition in a way that is disrespectful. Before any offensive tactic is taken a true risk must be taken. Initially, risk must be present in any argument. According to Henry Johnstone, Jr., as soon as you take away the option of risk, the argument is finished. A co-arguer may not want to take this risk out of the fear that he may loose the argument (Some Reflections on Argument # 6). A main point found in Johnstone’s writings on risk is that the co-arguer assumes the risk of having his
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Argument Method, Arguers Lovers, Bill Clinton, Wayne Brockriede, Argument Communities, Reflections Argument, Cal Ripken, Kivel Video, Ripken Jr, Unfortunately Kivel, argument #, kivels argument, arguers lovers, argument method, method #, arguers lovers #, lovers #, argument method #, argument # 6-7, # 6-7, argument communities, reflections argument #, shared frame, # 102, shared frame reference,
Approximate Word count = 3020
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
