to spank or not
Imagine your in the supermarket with a young boy about six years old in line in front of you that and screaming, crying, and pulling on his mothers leg to purchase a piece of candy. His mother simply tells him to stop it, stop it, stop it, or you will have to go into time out but this has no effect on the little boy's fierce tantrum. Most parents would not put up with that kind of behavior from their children although what kind of discipline would be appropriate. Spanking is an option of discipline that will benefit in the raising of a child when applied correctly and in correct circumstances, will teach them consequences of their own actions, increase their respect for authority, and aid in the reduction flair up child abuse. Spanking is not a form of discipline that should be used as an everyday disciplinary action but as said by Dr. John Rosemond (Family Psychologist) in an interview with Talk of the Nation "spanking is, at times, with certain children and certain situations, absolutely the best disciplinary response" (Melenda Penkava 2). Before spanking is employed other routes of dealing with bad behavior should be tried such as warnings, raised voice, time outs, and so on. Spankings should be the last resort and not
Baumrind, Diana; Freidman, Standford B. Pediatrics, "A blanket injunction against disciplinary use of spanking is not warranted by the data" Oct 96 Part 2 of 2, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p 857, 4p and p828, 4p. acted out as a violent lashing out toward the child. "So non-abusive spanking, which is, you know, one or two swats to the child's rear end with your hand, not with the intention of inflicting pain but with the intention of correcting and that massage coming across loud and clear to the child" (Dr. Rosemond, Melenda Penkava 3). The use of physical punishment should be limited and used at an as needed bases determined by the parent of the child. When used correctly and at the right times spanking can be a child rearing tool that will prove itself to be successful in teaching respect of authorities, and may decrease the chance of unexpected abuse situations. shment also should be used with control and reasoning. "Spanking is not a generative cause of aggression or pathology in children or adults when used appropriately spanking is controlled and contingent on the child's behavior; the child is forewarned; the parent uses more positive than negative incentives; spanking is carried out in conjunction with reasoning, with the intention to correct not retaliate, and does not escalate to abuse" (Baumrind 2). The use of reasoning with the child, whether it is done before or after the punishment, of why they are being punished along with a spanking will help imprint the consequence of their particular offence. tended. Permissive parents apparently became violent because they felt that they could neither control the child's behavior nor tolerate its effect upon themselves" (Larzelere 389-390). This observation shows how the limited use of spanking because of the law my turn into a more severe case of unwanted physical punishment. Analyzing another aspect of child abuse and some of the causes that put it into motion will shed some light on the reasoning behind the high numbers of corporal punishment associated with a
Some common words found in the essay are:
Melenda Penkava, Dr Sears, Diana Baumrind's, , Standford Pediatrics, Sweden United, Alece Spare, Talk Nation, corporal punishment, Behavior Vol, Well-Being Jun, physical punishment, antisocial behavior, child abuse, permissive parents, abuse rates, spanking child, child abuse rates, care giver's, child's behavior, melenda penkava, study sweden determine, moderate physical punishment,
Approximate Word count = 1376
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
