Racial discrimination is defined as unfavorable treatment, or having fine judgement or taste against a distinct race or minority. It is an epidemic that has been occurring for hundreds of years. Throughout different time periods people have been discerning others because of physical characteristics uncommon to each other. In 1607, English colonists in Jamestown, Virginia, became the first Americans to bring African slaves to the New World thus beginning hundreds of years of discrimination.

There have been many improvements in the area of racial discrimination through laws and personal views, but racism still exists, and probably will for many years to come. In the workplace racial discrimination is so prevalent that there is one whole title in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 specifically dedicated to quelling this issue. The problem today is deciding where to draw the fine line between racial discrimination and making a choice for the better of your business, and when that line is crossed.

But racial discrimination effects people other than those being directly discriminated. By definition, racia

Reverse discrimination in the workplace is defined as preferential treatment for minority group members in that workplace (Goldman 4). It can be either giving special treatment in considering an applicant for employment or in considering an employee for promotion or termination.

In the next case we will finally look at the concept of the set-aside. In the case FayComm v. US Small Business Administration a set-aside - designed to leave a certain number of contracts for minority firms to claim, ultimately was the cause of lengthy court battles and FayComm's loss of a contract they deserved.

These cases clearly show that Reverse Discrimination is a serious issue in American Society. Through the use of preferential hiring, quotas, and set-asides the government while trying to end discrimination, only succeeded in creating more discrimination. It is obvious that there is a need for some kind of solution to stop all discrimination. Though this paper was not written to solve discrimination, only analyze it, we will offer this final thought.

There is a belief that compensation should be made for wrongs done and that there is a need to improve the economic status of minorities, but by making special treatment for some, it is inevitable that others are discriminated against (Fullinwider 2-5). The only thing that is accomplished by these reverse discrimination practices is that the injustice is merely shifted from one group to another (Urofsky 30) rather than working on a solution to abolish it .

at ultimately, there is such a thing as race. If we are to overcome racism we must first learn that there is no such thing as race - there are only people. Affirmative Action is therefore thought of as simply another way for America to become an even more race-conscious society, thus keeping minorities from progressing.

It seems to be an odd complement of ideas to be put together in the same Title. On one hand you have a part of the Title that states that the decision is up to the judgement of the court and on the other hand you have another section that states that it is actually not up to the court to decide - it is simply wrong.

It became increasingly evident to us that the reason for discrimination in the first place is because humans have this preconceived notion that for some reason, all people are not equal. No matter what the Constitution states or what laws are passed this idea seems to be engrained so deeply that it is quite difficult to overcome. When we finally realize that this conception is in fact irrational and holding us back ... then we will be in the right mind set to abolish all forms of

The next similar example is of a female denied a position because of a less qualified minority.

Karst, Kenneth L., Levy, Leonard W., Mahoney, Dennis J. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: MacMillian Publishing Company, 1986.

It is interesting to note that while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the main piece of legislature that frames our civil rights, it is also the main framework for allowing reverse discrimination. Section 706(g) essentially gives the court power to order preferential treatment if the accused employer "has intentionally engaged in an unlawful employment practice charged in the complaint." The statement: "which may include but is not limited to, reinstatement or hiring of employees ... or any other equitable relief as the court deems appropriate," is basically the court's right to impose any type of preferential treatment it sees as being necessary.

Although this decision implied that segregation was illegal it did little to enforce the idea. There was still an opposition to integration that held the equal rights movement back. It was seen that there was a need for firm legislation that would not only lay down terms for equal rights but be able to enforce them too.

Nothing contained in this title shall be interpreted to require any employer ..

Some common words found in the essay are:
Rights Act, Law Zigarelli, Affirmative Action, Bagley A-6, Reverse Discrimination, Jon McCalla, Supreme Court, Business Administration, Supervisor Pepsi, Discrimination Controversy, civil rights, reverse discrimination, equal opportunity, preferential hiring, preferential treatment, affirmative action, rights act 1964, fourteenth amendment, act 1964, rights act, racial discrimination, civil rights act, discrimination reverse discrimination, basic civil rights, adversitynet victims preferential,
Approximate Word count = 3739
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page double spaced)