Homosexuality has been on debate for numerous years. On the other hand, homosexuals have suffered from intolerance, prejudice, and discrimination for many years. However, in recent years some of the myths about homosexuality have been proven wrong. Homosexuality is not a sickness and also it is not linked with any psychiatric problems. On the other hand, homosexual males are not limited to any particular jobs, like hairdressing, interior decorating or the arts, although some popular stereotypes suggest this is true.

In recent times, two philosophers have spoken how they feel about homosexuality. Michael Levin and Richard Mohr's views on the subject are in conflict with one another. Levin argues that homosexuality is abnormal because it is a misuse of body parts that have evolved for use in heterosexual intercourse (Levin 354). Furthermore, because natural selection has made the exercise of heterosexuality rewarding to human beings, homosexuality has a high probability to unhappiness. Mohr refutes Levin's stance about homosexuality myths and stereotypes. He rejects arguments that homosexuality is immoral or un

In conclusion, homosexuality is a widespread subject that we cannot give exact decisions and ideas about it. . Like all those overcome by sin, it involves a complicated process, one that can be overcome only with Divine help, together with the assistance of understanding and patience on the part of children of God!

Understanding this problem is very much related to also understanding the modern concept of "sexual orientation" and the related issues becoming increasingly apparent to many professionals. Those most annoyed by this development, however, are the ones wanting to believe that males who recognise their same-gender sexual desires form a separate species distinct from another species: the 100 percent apparently genetically created heterosexual males forming more than 95 percent of the male population. Reality, however, may be very different from what most people believe and act out, as it has been repeatedly experienced throughout human history.

it violates the function of genitals, which is to produce babies. The problem with this view is that lots of bodily parts have lots of functions and just because some one activity can be fulfilled by only one organ, this activity does not condemn other functions of the organ immorality (Mohr 367). The use of genitalia to produce children does not condemn other uses, such as achieving intimacy. Mohr states that moral authority is needed to define proper function (Mohr 368). Some people try to fill in this moral authority by appeal to the design or order of an organ saying that the genitals are designed for the purpose of procreation. But these people do not make it explicit who is the designer and orderer is. If it is God, then we are holding others accountable for religious beliefs. In response to Levin statement that homosexuality causes unhappiness, Mohr states that Society's attitude toward a childless couple is that of pity. The couple who discovers it cannot have childre!

hat this man will have a dim future on purely physiological grounds (Levin 355).

natural. Levin exemplifies the point that homosexuality is misuse of body parts with the case of Mr. Smith, who likes to play "Old MacDonald"

Some common words found in the essay are:
Mohr Society's, Richard Mohr's, Ancient Greek, According Levin, Dean Edell, According Mohr, HOMOSEXUALITY Homosexuality, Northwestern University, male homosexuality, male youth, misuse body, male youth suicide, youth suicide, moral authority, construction male homosexuality, genetic origin, designer orderer, homosexuality genetic, accountable religious beliefs, richness life, homosexually oriented, percent male population, social construction male,
Approximate Word count = 1463
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)