Why Capital Punishment Should be Abolished

Unlike popular belief, the death penalty does not act as a deterrent to criminals. As stated by Alfred Blumstein, "Expert after expert and study after study has shown the lack of correlation between the treat of the death penalty and the occurrence of violent crimes." (Blumstein 68) Isaac Ehrlich's study on the limiting effects of capital punishment in America reveals this to the public. The study spans twenty-five years, from 1957 till 1982, and shows that in the first year the study was conducted, there were 8060 murders and 6 executions. However, in the last year of the study there were 22,520 murders committed and only 1 execution performed. (Blumstein 54) This clearly shows that many violent criminals are not afraid of the capital punishment.

Abolitionists believe the offenders should be required to compensate the victim's family with the offender's own income from employment or community service. There is no doubt that someone can do more alive than dead. By working, the criminal inadvert-ently "pays back" society and also their victim and/or victim's family. There is no reason for the criminal to receive any compensation for the work they do, because money is of no jail time. Th

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Bedau Society, Isaac Ehrlich's, Donald Harding, Associated Press, John Evans, Stanford University, Leopold Loeb, Supreme Court, John Lock, United Constitution, death penalty, capital punishment, cruel unusual, supreme court, death penalty abolished, seventy- five, van den, method executing, penalty fails, victim's family, opponents capital punishment, van den haag, death penalty fails, abolished barbaric,
Approximate Word count = 1995
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)