criminal procedure
The overall issue is whether the offered evidence obtained by the State in the robbery trial of Andy and Bob should be suppressed.The first issue is whether Officer Short had probable cause to stop the VW bug. When a police officer has probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, the officer makes an arrest. An arrest may occur either with or without a warrant (most are made without a warrant). Arrest usually involves taking the suspect into custody and transporting him to the police station. Officer Short believed that the individual and the car fit the description of the recent robbery of the pharmacy. However, the defendant will argue that the description was too vague, that it was not in close proximity of the crime scene, that there was a lapse of time and the office was not in hot pursuit of the defendant. The 4th amendment provides, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The 4th amendment thus appli
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Officer Short, Andy Victor, Miranda Nevertheless, Furthermore Andy, Office Short, Bob Furthermore, , probable cause, Office Sho, officer short, evidence seized, suspect custody, Mother Burtons, Edwards Furthermore, probable cause believe, cause believe, search car, 4th amendment, short probable, search seizure, officer short probable, short probable cause, elicit incriminating response, due process, reasonably elicit incriminating,
Approximate Word count = 1713
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
